[PREV - THROUGH_THE_LENS]    [TOP]

DEAD_HAND


                                                      February 22, 2004
The April 1945 issue of                              
"Astounding Science Fiction"          Four months to go
had as it's lead story,               to the Hiroshima
"Dead Hand" by Issac Asimov.          detonation on  
                                      August 6, 1945.
It was billed as                                     
"A Foundation Story"                                 
on the cover...                                      
so that was already                                  
a selling point by then.                             
                                                     
This is a story with some very     The second paragraph
clumsy language in places.         takes a few readings
                                   to decipher... I wonder
And it's characters are            if it made it into the     SECOND_PARAGRAPH
lightly sketched in at             collected trilogy form.
best... but how could                                
it be otherwise?                                     
                                                     
In the space of 55 pages,                            
Asimov takes on the theme                            
of the inevitability of                              
corruption and decline,      Yet another example that
using no less than 5 major   contradicts the notion       
characters representing      that there's something       
different viewpoints.        inherently optimistic        
                             about science fiction.       
                                                         
The two major factions
are, of course,
Foundation and Empire
but within *each* of        The point is made that the
these is the old and        old guard can do nothing
enervated and the           without the assistance of
young and energetic.        the young, but also that the    This is explicit
                            old *must* regard the young     for the Imperial
And then there's a          as a threat to their            side, less so for
fifth viewpoint,            authority.                      the Foundation
Ducem Barr, a True                                          side, but I think
Believer in Hari                                            it's there.
Seldon and his
"psychohistory".
                            Psychohistory:                              Heh:
How are we supposed         that child of Gibbon      (Or at least,     Gibbs
to take this man?  He       and stat-thermo.          Asimov cited      and
admits that he himself                                Gibbon. It        Gibbon?
lacks the mathematics       Based on an analogy       couldn't be
to do psychohistory         between human beings      Spengler again,
himself, he just insists    and gas molecules:        could it?)
that if Seldon said it,     unpredictable as
that's good enough for      individuals, obeying             I have a vague
him.                        strict rules in                  impression that
                            aggregate.                       Campbell and
He keeps telling                                             Asimov were
people that                 PV=nRT, right?                   waging a quiet
there's no point                                             war about who
in them trying to           And yet, weather                 invented what
do anything,                predictions a week               here.
because it'll all           ahead remain
come out as                 pretty weak...                   I remember
foreordained by                                              Asimov insisting
Seldon.                                                      that he was
                                    Psychohistory is         thinking about
This all has the                    an interesting           hitting Campbell
whiff of the                        notion, though as        with the idea of
Gambler's Fallacy                   is typical of SF         re-working
about it to me;                     it's worked up           Gibbon.  The
he's trying to                      into such an             legend is that
make certain                        exaggerated form         Campbell had
predictions on                      that this "science"      this psycho-
the next roll of                    often might as           history notion,
the dice based on                   well be magic.           and it's
knowledge of the                                             certainly got a
expected average                    The incredibly           Campbell ring to
outcome.                            *detailed*               it.
                                    predictions
                                    Seldon comes up          (Asimov also
                                    with, down to            complained about
The young, energetic                the *year* of a          Campbell's
Foundation man says                 "crisis" a               right wing
something about how                 hundred years            attitudes and
this reasoning seems                hence.  Like             near-racism,
backward to                         predicting next          and explains
him... and I'm                      year's hurricanes.       that this is
inclined to agree.                                           why aliens
                                                             were left out
  But maybe I'm *supposed*                                   of the Foundation
  to agree.  Maybe this man                                  universe...
  is an example of                                           He didn't want
  psychohistory in decline,                                  to have to write
  a science degenerating                                     another hymn to
  into a religon....                                         the superiority
                                                             of humans -- in
    Issac Asimov is                                          their ultimate
    not generally                                            incarnation as
    given credit for                                         WASPs.)
    subtlety, but there
    are a number of
    touches like this
    that make you wonder.


        What was Asimov thinking
        about when he was
        contemplating historical
        necessities, and the
        frailty of any human             DECLINATION
        organization?


           In the background lurks the
           second World War on the heels
           of the first, after the Great
           Depression that in many
           people's minds had discredited
           capitalism quite as thoroughly
           as the collapse of the Soviet
           Union discredited communism
           for us.
                                         The Empire with it's direct
   The "dead hand" of                    command-and-control structure
   title refers to the                   is dying, and the more
   debate about whether                  mercantilist Foundation is
   they are all dancing                  already showing some signs of
   to Seldon's strings                   collapse under greed and
   (or more accurately,                  complacency.
   to the strings Seldon
   identified), of if
   there remains any
   latitude for human
   action to effect events.



--------
[NEXT - SECOND_PARAGRAPH]