[PREV - VAMPIRISM]    [TOP]

DRACULA


                                             August 3, 2011

Reading Stoker's "Dracula" (1897),
and trying to see it anew.              Many of The Count's best lines
                                        are from Stoker.  "Ah, the children
I couldn't get into reading it          of the night, what music they make!"
as a kid, the epistolary
nature was very off-putting.

    I wonder about taxonomies that
    regard "epistolary" and "gothic"        They strike me as
    as seperate literary categories.        different logical
                                            categories:

The dialog is cloying in many                   One is a device,
places, but then, that's                        telling a story
Victorian fiction for you.                      with bogus
                                                documents,
                                                e.g. in the form
                                                of letters, the
   Leading off with Harkers encounter           other a matter of
   with Dracula is interesting: it              content, a focus
   establishes the sort of thing that's         on dark fantastic
   going on rather quickly, it brings           elements in
   the reader up to speed to the point          quasi-medieval
   where I would guess that they're not         settings.
   much behind the viewers of the many
   movies that descend from this work
   ("children of the night", indeed).

   If I weren't already familiar with this
   work, I might take it as a rather obnoxious
   attack on Science-- every single piece of
   folklore concerning vampires turns out            Similarly, Helsing does
   to be true.  Van Helsing is never faced           not measure the spacing
   with the need to winnow through it and            between vampire Lucy's
   experimentally determine which techniques         fangs and compare them
   are effective and which are not.                  to the children's
                                                     wounds-- a piece of data
   I wonder how Protestants felt about the           that would be useful in
   work when it was first released... save           persuading a medic like
   for one nod toward reservations about             Seward.
   the "idolotrous" nature of Catholism,
   throughout the story they wield crosses
   and holy wafer like talismans (though
   more often than not, they rely on
   garlic flowers).

   Harker and his aquaintences are all bound
   up in the Count's activities apparently
   just by chance, but this horrible mess of
   coincidence is not even remarked upon
   by anyone... Stoker doesn't even make a
   nod toward covering it, like "What is
   Dracula's evil scheme in afflicting
   these people?"

      Note: Lucy and Mina happen to be
      on hand when Dracula's ship
      wrecks on the shore... were they
      vacationing there because they
      were awaiting the arrival
      of Jonathan?  I don't think
      Stoker even makes a nod like that
      toward an explanation.

  Around Chapter 18, they suddenly discover
  the house that Dracula is inhabiting,
  but I missed the reasoning behind this.
  Is it simply the one that Harker brokered
  for him?

  As of Chapter 19, the tactics of our brave
  team of vampire-fighters are horrible.  They        Ah, actually they
  know Dracula is inactive at night and yet           go in at 5 a.m.
  they try moving in at night...  did it occur        So we can have some
  to them at all to provide Mina-- left behind        dramatic action at
  over her objections because she's Just A            dawn scenes?
  Woman-- with minimal protection (garlic and
  cross?)... I gather not.                                But why not move
                                                          in after dawn?
     Van Helsing's earlier
     screw-up with Lucy is better
     handled... he has Dracula
     held off, but doesn't yet         Other aspects of Helsing's
     realize Drac can compel other     mishandling of Lucy's case
     creatures to clear his way.       are less forgiveable, if
                                       perhaps *somewhat*
                                       understandable:

                                          e.g. neglecting to tell
                                          other people in the house
                                          to leave the fucking garlic
                                          flowers alone.


                It took me quite some time to notice
                this... but isn't Dracula restricted to
                moving at night?  Somewhat late in the
                novel he appears to be flying around at
                noon... unless I was really confused
                and it was really supposed to be
                midnight then.  A side-effect of the
                epistolary style, you're told dates and
                times at the outset of each passage,
                and the author feels no need to remind
                you of the time of day. There's often
                no way direct way to confirm what time
                it's supposed to be: Stoker doesn't do a
                great job of expressing elapsed time.

    The scene where Mina demands to be hypnotized by
    Helsing is interesting in a number of ways:
    (1) it's Mina's idea... she shifts from victim back
        to pursuer.
    (2) she doesn't have to explain what it's about
    (3) everyone knows that Helsing can hypnotize her.
    (4) when she starts picking up telepathic impressions
        from Dracula, no one finds this surprising,
        or remarkable, or doubts the reliability of the
        impressions.




--------
[NEXT - DOCTOR_STRANGE]