[PREV - WILD_LOTTERY] [TOP]
FALSE_KARL
May 6, 2008
BLACK_SWAN
"Karl Popper was once asked whether one
'could falsify falsification' (in other
words, if one could be skeptical about
skepticism). His answer was that he
threw students out of his lectures for
asking far more intelligent questions
than that one." -- p. 193
It may not be a counter-argument
against falsification to say that But actually, I'm not
it's not falsifiable; but if so, sure that you can't
that would show that on it's own falsify falsification.
terms the doctrine of falsifiability You would just need to
is not a scientific doctrine. find cases where the
"falsifiability"
That automatically raises the question criterion rejects a
of what else we might consider to be hypothesis that
correct, true, and/or valuable which strikes us a scientific.
is nevertheless not "scientific".
If that seems
It takes some of the wind out of the ad hoc, well,
sails of the accusation "but that is where else do you
not falsifiable!" think principles
like this come
from?
We infer them from
actual cases; we
design them to
systematize
existing practice.
Karl Popper did
not invent the
scientific method.
(And neither did
Peirce or Mills.)
--------
[NEXT - SCALING_SIMILARITY]