[PREV - FAME]    [TOP]

IMPOSSIBLE


                                             May 9-11, 2011               
  Kevin Kelley (Ted talk, 2003) looks                                     
  over the amazing development of the                                     
  web in it's first 5000 days...                                          
                                                                          
    Wikipedia was impossible in theory,                                   
    but possible in practice, therefore                                   
    he concludes:                                                         
                                                                          
    "We have to get good at                                               
    believing the impossible."       A fine justification                 
                                     for jumping off cliffs.              
                                                                          
       If the impossible in theory                        (From a contradiction,
       is possible in practice, that                       anything follows.)
       means your theory sucked.                                          
                                                                   Most things
         It does not mean that         Wikipedia's success--       that seem
         all theories suck.            temporary or not--          impossible
                                       is a suprising result,      really are
         It *does* mean that we        experience that needs       impossible.
         need better theories.         to be learned from.                
                                                                           
            I submit that we             Concluding that our attempts      
            can not proceed              at learning will yield only       
            without some sort            suprising results would be the    
            of mental model of           wrong lesson.                     
            what can be done...                                            
                                                                          
               Shall we just step back and try to                         
               keep a completely open mind, let                           
               a million flowers bloom just to                            
               see which ones survive and evolve?                         
               But if you are in charge of                                
               creating one of those flowers you                          
               really do want some conception of                          
               what sort of flower is viable.                             
                                                                          
                   We can't all stand back and wait                       
                   to see where other people succeed.                     
                                                                          
                                                                              
                                           And who is the "we" that Kelley  
                                           refers to?  Did a belief that     
                                           wikipedia was impossible delay 
                                           it's creation?                     
                                                                              
  Isn't an embrace of the                                                     
  "impossible" a defense of                                                   
  acting blindly?                                                             

     All these variations of
     Clark's third, all these
     dismissal's of "experts"...         UNDERTHINK
     what is it really about?

     Planning is hard, so let's go
     shopping for whatever comes along.




                                            
  I'm left going with a resolution to choose     
  a set of beliefs that don't automatically      
  side-track you into being an observer who      
  never acts because nothing is really known      DARK_HOPE
  or knowable-- that's a real trap.                                                     
                                                                                          
    It was liberating to hear Kelley                                                     
    say this, because the remark                    
    seems so *obviously* dubious                             
    once you hear it stated flat-out...     
                                            
       The idea that my grasp of what's    
       reasonable, workable and useful might
       be completely wrong-- it's been               ACCESS_RAMP
       hovering around, haunting my thoughts
       (and I suspect the wider discourse)
       for so long that being freed of it
       suddenly is inspiring.



                     It's hard to move without
                     some courage of conviction.




--------
[NEXT - CONTRADICTORY_DIALECT]