[PREV - HAPPY_BREED]    [TOP]

LIGHT_EXPECTATIONS


                                         March 20, 2003

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's
"The White Company" (1891):

Set in the 14th century: Medieval
warfare, with Brits trooping about in
southern France fighting against
Spain.  Swords and longbows, and an
occasional catapult.

This is some of the work that Doyle
regarded as his real writing
(he was much annoyed at the extreme       And further, he was annoyed
popularity of trifles like Sherlock       that "The White Company"
Holmes).                                  was always praised for
                                          being a rousing adventure
                                          story, completely ignoring
    But it alternates slices of           it's Serious Aspects.
    meticulous 14th century
    historical detail with action
    that would go well in an
    Errol Flynn movie, and many of
    the secondary figures have all
    the well-realized
    characterization of Doc
    Savage's henchmen
    (e.g. there's a fat knight
    that continually talks about
    food in the middle of battles).



While this book champions chivalry it does
it without cheating.  It's about an elderly,            A later book titled
accomplished knight by the name of "Sir                 "Sir Nigel" is a
Nigel". Sir Nigel is the model of old school            prequel about his
chivalry to the point of often seeming like             younger days.
a cartoon, a Don Quixote figure.  But Doyle
seems serious about upholding chivalry as an
ideal, and Sir Nigel is really intended to
be an admirable figure.  He grapples with a        The infamous Don Quixote,
terrible world in a way that he regards as         in contrast, strikes me as
honorable... though it's not at all clear          a total clown, a Mr. Magoo
that he and his kind are making it a better        of a knight.  Some fans of
place:                                             Cervantes profess to see
                                                   something honorable in
     France is totally in ruins, the               Quixote's deluded ideals,
     countryside devastated by eternal             but I don't, myself.
     combat and high taxation to support
     it: the pursuit of honorable combat                QUIXAND
     doesn't seem to be doing much good
     in the world.

        Sir Nigel fights for members of the
        noble classes that are portrayed as
        useless, vicious bastards.  And
        many of the combatants are far more
        interested in loot than glory; "The
        White Company" had degenerated to
        little more than a marauding gang
        of bandits before Sir Nigel arrives
        to become captain.

             There are also some interesting scenes
             we are shown of a French mob that rebels
             against some of the more obnoxious
             nobles...  but the mob runs wild with
             aimless violence and they slaughter a
             priest who was actually on their side.


     So: this is a multi-sided
     conflict where none of the sides
     seems worth defending...

And yet, "Sir Nigel" conducts himself
according the the strict rules of his
code, and is proud of having done so.

       Perhaps, the contrast between the
       world, and Nigel's code is supposed       Existential
       to make the upholding the code even       absurdity.
       more admirable?
                                                   The struggle is more
       Chivalry as a code of conduct               heroic if it's impossible.
       for an imperfect world?

                                         Another related theme of
                                         the book: the importance of
   We count ourselves as practical       living engaged with the
   people, and we are therefore          world, as opposed to
   "results oriented".  For us,          cloistered contemplation of
   means are used to obtain ends.        the soul...
   Even the idealists have definite
   goals in mind, and plan their                    A kind of realism, but
   actions accordingly.                             without disengagement
                                                    and disillusionment.

         But an idealist, insisting on
         bringing about a better world,
         is eternally frustrated and
         unhappy.

         The end always seems distant.

         The world seems irredeemable.


Trying to improve the world
is a recipe for frustration:

But a set of ideals that focuses
on "means" is more achievable,             A meta-goal, a need
at least when it's just your own           for achievable goals.
means that you worry about.                If you need to win
                                           fights, then fight
   Finding a way that's                    winnable fights.
   worth living in a
   worthless world.



    Live with honor, fight well, do things the right
    way without regard to the way other people do
    them.  Let the end result wait for the end.

    And you'll be happier.

    And the world might even become a better place,
    as a side-effect, if not as your main intention.       (Or it
                                                           might
                                                           not...)

--------
[NEXT - DARK_HOPE]