procmail_weirdness

This is part of The Pile, a partial archive of some open source mailing lists and newsgroups.



Subject: Re: reply to redhat list not always there
From: "Anthony E. Greene" <agreene@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 16:33:23 +0200 (CEST)

On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Bret Hughes wrote:
>Why do most of the mails I get from the list have the reply
>to set to refhat-list but not all.  I often realize after
>the fact that I have sent the mail to the original sender
>and not the list when that was not  my intention.  Can a
>promail recipe add the reply to if not there before sending
>it to the mail mox i filter the list messages to?

Sure.

# Add a Reply-To to redhat-list messages
:0
* ^X-Loop: redhat-list@redhat.com
  {
    :0 f
    | formail -a 'Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com'

    :0:
    nsmail/Lists/redhat
  }


Use "formail -A" if you want to force your Reply-To header to replace the
existing one.
 
===



the rest of The Pile (a partial mailing list archive)

doom@kzsu.stanford.edu