[PREV - BEYOND_THE_BLUE] [TOP]
BEYOND_CRITICISM_WITHIN_REACH
April 15, 2018
The same point came up in two places in:
BEYOND_THE_BLUE
Srinivasan speaks as though there are only two
choices, either we'll regard desire (e.g.
a sexual fetish) as fair game for discussion and
criticism, or we'll regard it as "fixed" and
never question where it came from or how it
relates to any other attitude.
I think the actual issue is not whether
you're *allowed* to discuss the context One might hope for a future where
or history underlying any sexual complex, black guys doing blondes no longer
but what role you expect that discussion seems tremendously transgressive
to play. without expecting that a ban on
pornography about such things will
The default feminist attitude often help us get there any faster.
seems to be judgmental finger-waggling.
Setting yourself up as some sort of fetish
approval committe is unlikely to go over BLOND_AMBITION
very well-- in fact it's unlikely to
modify any sexual attitudes greatly
(though it might succeed in driving them
underground-- "silencing" them).
PHILOSOPHER_ACTIVIST
For me, the question is why
any exposition on the source
of desire be expected to
necessarily undercut it...
even if it isn't
"fixed" or "primordial".
What would ever give you the idea
that a frontal assault on a sexual
fetish, angrily describing it as
Bad Think rooted in a long history
of Bad Think is going to somehow (Oooh, tell me more
fix it? about how bad and
nasty I am.)
--------
[NEXT - THE_QUEER_WAVE]