[PREV - ENGINE_TROUBLE] [TOP]
BITWASTES_METASTASIZED
October 30, 2021
October 04, 2022
BITWASTES
David Auerbach,
"Bitwise: A Life in Code", p.184:
"People like to speak of Google's ranking algorithm
as its 'secret sauce', but this ever-shifting recipe
is one that not even Google's own engineers could
write down. 'Usefulness' had metastasized from a
humanly comprehensible algorithm into an arcane
calculation involving hundreds of individual factors
per page. The relationship of Google's measure of
'usefulness' to *our* measure of 'usefulness'
remained more or less steady, but this continuity
masked how much Google's algorithm diverged from
intuitive thought processes."
Another thing that's pretty well masked
is the actual usefulness of search
results. We're long past the era when
a Google search did an amazing job of
finding just what I was looking
for... now it's more likely to give me
a pointer to a place I would've looked
next in any case.
ENGINE_TROUBLE
That is, when it doesn't give me a half
dozen links to authors of completely
unknown province, writing for obscure,
veiled purposes.
If I do try to use a web search,
I end up prioritizing the links
to sites I'm already familiar
with. The others aren't likely
to be worth that much.
To get *real* information you almost
always want something curated by BROKEN_WEB
professionals at government/university
sites.
In the early days of the web, people would ask me to find stuff
for them, and I would often succeed just by thinking about
different sites and what I'd seen there-- altavista was a bit
better at this than I was, and google originally did a much better
job than I could on my own. With the present-day, dumbed-down
web, we're back to the best way to find stuff is to first think
about the places you're going to check.
Wikipedia, stackoverflow...
Reuters, Guardian UK...
We're back to the point where people ask
each other how to find things rather than
resort to web searches because it
increasingly seems like a waste of time.
--------
[NEXT - BITWASTES_DUMBGOD]