[PREV - GORIOT] [TOP]
BOVARY
September 15, 1998
Flaubert's Madame Bovary is clearly a very
good book, but the reputation that preceeds
it is the really fascinating thing about it. (Trans. by Paul de Man.)
This is a profoundly cynical work.
The main character is
completely lacking in anything like
virtue -- for want of a better word. She has our sympathies
often, but rarely our
And the narative makes many assaults respect.
on science and philosophy: declaring
it all the ranting of pompous fools.
The scientist as charlatan. Is it any wonder that
this book is beloved
So Flaubert is the by the humanities,
father of realism? given their intense
Flaubert is the next jelousy of the social
step after Balzac? status of scientists,
and intense suspicion
Yes, Flaubert's of all things technical?
language seems more
polished (even in
translation, much of
it is really beautiful Though... doesn't it
prose poetry)... seem a bit lifeless? Flaubert was
renowned for the
But to me the Or perhaps, agnonies he went
big difference Flaubert's through in choosing
is Flaubert's precision is just the right
rejection of all untranslatable? word...
systematized
knowledge A looser work
compared to might allow
Balzac's more scope. Maybe this was
attempt to all counter-
comprehend all. productive.
AEOLIAN_EXHAUST
Even Tolstoy --
for all his assault on
conventional wisdom and
romantic individualism in
favor of a philosophy of (humanity
historical inevitability in the
grip of
fate...?)
Even Tolstoy is an
optimist in comparison:
At least he holds out
some hope for a science
of history to develop.
--------
[NEXT - AEOLIAN_EXHAUST]