[PREV - BY_INCHES] [TOP]
CAUTIONARY
March 18, 2009
A virtue of science fiction:
it can be a tool to address
the fundamental issues.
A vice of science fiction:
even when it addresses
fundamental issues, it
continually veers toward
extreme cases.
The cautionary tale If we had abstract
tends towards the principles that were
simplified, the worth anything, then we
exaggerated. could reason from
extreme cases to settle
issues logically.
Just to take an example:
there's a Fritz Leiber But because we have no such
story based on the principles, because the best we
invention of an have are approximations, guesses,
automated reminder rules-of-thumb, extreme cases are
gadget that whispers often useless, and frequently
into your ear so that just misleading.
you don't forget
appointments and so on. "Hard cases
make bad laws."
These gadgets quickly
become more elaborate,
they're supplied with
sensors in the form
of "eyes", they
become more intelligent.
Everyone is walking around
with these *things* on their
shoulders that start out as
assistants, but quickly
become masters.
On the one hand: this story
could be taken as prescient.
It was written long before
watch alarms, let alone PDAs.
And yet, it's impossible
to recognize something
like an actual "smart
phone" in Fritz Leiber's
humps strapped on people's
shoulders, with bulging
eyes and whispered
instructions.
But it's far from being a stupid
story: in it's "satiric"
exaggeration you can recognize
real phenomena... new technologies
often seem liberating at first,
but after a while they may seem
like a subtle trap, an unwanted
dependency.
Were I giving a talk
on this subject, I might
try this schtick:
"A science fiction story might
describe some new technology
that's so addictive that
people lose touch with
reality, and go go stumbling
around in a fantasy world."
*slide from the ST:NG
episode, "The Game"*
"But do things like that
ever really happen?"
*image of a grinning
cellphone zombie*
--------
[NEXT - THE_PLASTIC_FALLACY]