[PREV - CHINATOWN_REAL] [TOP]
CODE_OF_SILENCE
June 3-7, 2013
From Peter Kwong's
"The New Chinatown",
p.95: THE_NEW_CHINATOWN
"Those who break the code of silence will
be punished. The case of a woman who This was a
worked in a Chinese-owned, unionized pink tab.
garment factory is typical. She complained TABS
to her union representative about
managment's violation of union work
rules. The following week, ads including
her picture were placed in several
Chinese-language newspapers. The caption
said: 'This is so-and-so, who is a good If this polite
worker, but is unhappy working at phrasing was intended
such-and-such a factory. Would some to provide legal
kindhearted owner please hire her?' cover, I have my
She was effectively blackballed." doubts it would've
held up.
But if it's target
audience *thought*
that it provided
cover, that's enough
I think we'd all agree that this is a bad for it to work. And
thing-- well most of us, there aren't too many after all even if it
free market die-hards left-- but nevertheless were shot down in
might there not be some virtue to having your court later it would
own internal dispute resolution channel that still do the main job.
one is expected to use before resorting to the
external ones? What's bad about the above is
the attempt to suppress *any* dissent. A wiser
organization might actually provide a set of
layers for dispute resolution that are agreed
to by all players-- monthly group discussions
and contracts that specify arbitration rather
than courts.
There's no point in treating the
institution of Chinatown as a
model to be precisely imitated.
The question is, can we learn
from it's virtues and fix it's
vices...
--------
[NEXT - FLAME_OUT]