[PREV - STYLES_OF_CARDBOARD]    [TOP]

DEAD_HARE


                                 April 30, 2006

Finished with:

  Iain Banks -- "Dead Air"

and immediately moved on to

  Iain M. Banks -- "Consider Phlebas"

Both Banks are the same fellow, of course.
He adopted a strategy of "branding" his
science fiction efforts with his middle
initial.

And somehow I'd though that that Banks was
using his uninitialized name to do Serious
Fiction, but instead I found "Dead Air" to be
a very trashy book, full of lots of low grade
sex and drugs.

The main character seems only barely
sympathetic to my eye, though I guess that's
the idea: this babbiling, cowardly fellow is
plunged into a "thriller" plot of sorts... but
this "thriller" takes a hell of a lot of pages
to get out the door.  Far from a roller-coaster,
it's more like being trapped on a long bus
ride with someone who is no where near as funny
as he thinks he is.

Oh, and there's lots of political editorials,
overblown ranting that seems no where near as
shocking as it's meant to be... a better
title might be "Hot Air".

                                        There isn't really much of
                                        a tie-in to the "Dead Air"
                                        phrase.  There's a little
                                        dialog that explains what it
                                        is (radio jargon for silence).

                                            The main character,
                                            is supposed to
                                            be a shock jock
                                            (liberal variety),
                                            and *he* never shuts up.

  The one thing the book has going              You could do some intellectual
  for it is a strange female lead,              gyrations to support the
  a woman with a pseudo-quantum                 meaning of the title --
  mechanical theory that she's                  maybe there's more than one
  half-dead and half-alive, all due             type of "dead air", and
  to a lightening strike when she               empty babble about uses for
  was a teenager-- it's left her                vibrating cell phones doesn't
  scarred on one side, but unmarked             count as the living breath.
  enough on the other to work as a
  fashion model.  This woman is                     But overall it seems
  calm, intelligent, insightful,                    like a very forced
  controlled, classy... she's a                     title.
  total contrast to the babbling
  low-voltage shock jock narrator
  who becomes her lover, and that
  contrast is one thing that really
  works in the novel.


On to "Consider Phlebas": this is the first of Banks
novels of "The Culture", copyright 1988.  Somehow I
expected this book would be more intelligent than it
is...  it's essentially a standard-issue space opera
with only a few real ideas going for it, and they're
just not all that heavy ideas.  It also seems like
an excessively lengthy book, with more than a little
touch of trashiness about it, though this time it's
attempts at cheap suspense rather than lots of
chatter about sex and drugs.

Charles Platt says that when he was working on his first
novel, he had the odd idea that he was supposed to hit
the contracted word count precisely, and so he decided
that a good gimmick would be to write the beginning and
end of the novel first: then somewhere in the middle he
has the main character fall down a hole and go blundering
around underground tunnels for awhile, only emerging
after expending the right number of words.

I had that feeling about this Banks novel...
the plot seems to fall down a hole for a long time.

There are a few things you can say in
praise of this book:

  o  He's writing about a utopian culture that
     the author personally believes in, but
     from the point of view of someone who is
     fanatically opposed to it.

  o  There are no cardboard characters. The
     lowliest spear-carrier has their own
     attitudes and motivations.  You
     understand why everyone is doing what
     they're doing, and so you have trouble       UNDERSTAND_JUSTICE
     hating them for it, however much you
     loath their actions.


     This is, or at least used to be,
     something of an article of
     faith among liberal humanists:

     There is no evil,
     only misunderstandings.

     But that rabbit
     won't hunt.                     (Speaking of forced titles.)

     Really: there
     is evil.           It is not always a result of
                        ignorance or insanity...
     And perhaps
     a bigger                  (And what of willful ignorance?
     problem:                   What of indulgence in insanity?)

     There are often
     irreconcilably opposed
     forces that understand
     each other perfectly,
     and they may not be
     easily classifiable as
     "good" or "evil"...          And that is exactly what
                                  Banks is writing about.




    "The frothy bubbles had frozen in the cold air
    and almost freezing water, making what looked
    like a tiny model of a galaxy; a fairly common
    sprial galaxy, like this one, like hers.
    She held the light confection of air and water
    and suspended chemicals and turned it over in
    her hands, sniffing it, sticking her tongue
    out and licking it, looking at the dim winter
    sun through it, flicking her finger to see if
    it would ring.

    "She watched her little rime galaxy start to melt,
    very slowly, and saw her own breath blow across it,
    a brief image of her warmth in the air."

           -- p. 277, "Consider Phelbas",
              in "State of play: two"



--------
[NEXT - GHOST_FINDER]