[PREV - SCITECH] [TOP]
DIFFICULT_LOVE
July 8, 2009
July 25, 2013
http://wiki.dandascalescu.com/
Skipping around in Dan Dascalescu's pages,
I find he seems to be an advocate of two positions:
(a) to be successful at doing something,
it must be something you love to do. The Peters
Principle?
(b) successful people have the knack of
working on things even when they don't
feel like it.
This seeming contradiction could just be
resolved by specifying the scale each point
applies to: the over-arching project must be
something you really want to see happen, even
though inevitably there will be many small
pieces of it that you dislike working on.
Then of course, there's the
small matter of determining
when all the "little things
you'd rather not do" are so
numerous, they are in fact
dominant--
More interesting, I would
say, is the complexities
of love in general.
CLIMBING
I like the example of rock
climbing, where you might
push yourself to do something Do I "love" rock climbing? I
extremely stenuous, sometimes frequently curse and scream all
even dangerous, even though the way up; when I don't fail and
there's no obvious pay off give up, going home with wounded
involved. pride and skinned knuckles.
Another example
One might love achievement, might be BDSM
and hence welcome challenges, activity, which
such as overcoming things can have similar
you dislike doing. characteristics.
The presumption that one must
"find what you love" presumes
that "you" are a fixed quantity;
and that the problem is just a
search.
It could be that the real
problem is that you must
first transform yourself
into someone that can THINK_YOU_ARE
love doing something...
--------
[NEXT - THINK_YOU_ARE]