[PREV - AI_SNAKE_OIL] [TOP]
GELERNTER_LOST_FAIR
September 19, 2026
A book I've head on my shelves for decades:
"1939: The Lost World of the Fair" (1995)
by David Gelernter
The 1939 World's Fair in New York
holds some interest to me-- But clearly not a
as does the 1964 World's Fair burning interest...
The location of both of the New York
World's Fairs (1939 and 1964)
was in the same "Flushing Meadows"
area in Queens.
The 1964 World's Fair happened when I
was still a little kid living in Brooklyn,
just a few miles away from it.
There's a pecularity about this book that took me some
work to sort out, but I'll spare you the blow-by-blow:
It's a work of history that uses a device of quoting a
fictional diary, discussing two fictional characters.
The signalling that he's going to be mixing historical
fiction with history is non-existent, and the place where
he does the transition is pretty murky and easy to miss.
There's nothing clever or innovative about this--
it's a gross misuse of a device. Did he think it
would break the spell if he just said what he was
doing?
Did anyone let this guy
write anything else, I
wondered? It turns out
he's had a number of books This world's fair book
published... and he's got sounds like one of his
quite the background: saner saner efforts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gelernter
The best thing you can say about him is he's a
unabomber victim-- a Computer Science prof at Yale.
I don't think much of conservatives whining about
college campuses being unfriendly to right-wing
crazies but at least he's got some street cred on
that one.
Gelernter was also a Trump supporter; he's
developed a crypto clearing house; and he was
corresponding with Jeffrey Epstein for six
years, which has gotten him bounced from Yale.
There's something impressive about attracting
criticism from wide-ranging sources like Steven
Pinker and Russell Jacoby.
So looking at this book isn't just *random*,
it's more like "looking for wisdom in unlikely places".
Gelernter's got a few remarks I thought were of
at least minor interest:
Gelertner defends 1939 against the charge that
it was an "unsophisticated" era-- as he puts it,
focusing on the hokey messaging in news reels If he really wanted
ignores the woman in the corner smiling at it. to capture the spirit
Popular composers of the time like Gershwin of the era, he should've
compare well with modern popular music. rolled with that,
e.g. chapter titles
written like newsreel
blurb parodies.
Gelertner argues that the 1939 view of new
technology was more nuanced than present day,
comparing late '30s comments on the invention
of television to more recent gushing about the
information super-highway.
Gelertner makes the point that the Futurama
exhibit was clearly in love with the dream of
suburbia (Levittown was a half dozen years
ahead).
Gelertner talks about the Amusement area of the
fair that included a lot of what amounts to
soft-core porn performances and comments that
then, as now, there was a wide range of opinions
about these things.
Discussing the 1939 take on women's equality
Gelertner comments that they both believed
that women were capable of professional work
but also believed that their main
responsibility was caring for children-- There I think
these days we tend to expect equality to Gerlertner was
equal numbers of men and women in each letting his own
profession, but back then they didn't. opinions leak
into the story.
--------
[NEXT - GELERNTER_LOST_MIRRORS]