[PREV - CAREER] [TOP]
GENERAL
Being a renaissance man, a generalist....
The smart money is always on specialization,
on narrowing your field of focus,
concentrating your efforts...
Cutting away pieces of your brain,
to let other pieces flourish.
The temptations are obvious:
to try to do everything,
to be everything you can be instead
of just one thing you can be.
Ted Nelson's one excuse offered for
the problems he has had in his
career:
"The problem with being a generalist NELSON
is that you have no territory to
defend."
Alfred Bester's claim that Science
Fiction is a refuge for Renaissance People like Asimov,
Men, for people interested in who cut wide, but
everything. never deep.
Think about some others.
Feynman? An interesting
example: someone who
started tightly focused, Stuart Reges sounds like the
and only branched out same kind of guy, in a way.
later. Computer Science first, only
later did he become more
politically active. I think
he credits Bloom for
encouraging him to read more
widely.
Specialize in what you're working on
at the moment. (Said by who? A Russian physicist?
Perhaps Sakharov?)
(John McCarthy also offered excuses
for working outside of his field...
what were they again?)
Maybe more interesting: he mentions a
case where he felt bad about having
done it. Nuclear rockets, limited by
the melting point of Uranium. He
suggested a centrifugal design using
molten uranium, and wrote a paper about
it. Years later, someone contacted
him, inviting him to submit an article
about his recent work on the idea, but It would have
of course, he had done no such been someone's
work... and if only he'd never written territory to
the article, maybe someone else would defend.
have come up with the idea, and
followed up on it.
"The writer will offer no apology for making
this experiment. His disqualifications are
manifest. But such work needs to be done by
as many people as possible...."
H.G. Wells, "Outline of History", p.vi
--------
[NEXT - ALONE]