[PREV - OLDANDGREY] [TOP]
GREY
May, 1992
Let's say I (in my capacity as a white guy)
get into a heated discussion with a black guy. OLDANDGREY
He gets upset and calls me "stupid white
trash". I get upset and call him a "stupid
nigger". Under the Grey intrepretation, I can
be brought up on Fun Stan charges, for
"harassing" him, but not vice versa. GREYASSYM
Note that this is a single incident.
(Personally, I think the word "harassment"
implies an ongoing situation, e.g. if I were The reasoning according
to scream "nigger" outside his window every to Grey, seems to be that
night.) since these folks may
have had to deal with
Also note, that in the above example it's a bunch of other dudes
clear that I'm on one side of the Grey line, screaming a similar
and the rhetorical black guy is on the other. epithet, doing it once
If you pick a different group, a different is really another entry
epithet, it may not be so clear. in a campaign of repeated
harrasment.
You know, I think the Grey amendment to the
Fun Stan is amazingly silly and irrelevant. Completely ignores
It doesn't really address the incidents that the chilling effect
led up to it's creation, it's never been of this ruling,
applied to any real case (possibly, because focusing entirely
they either know it won't stand up or are on the _victim_'s
afraid of the consequences if it *did* stand point of view...
up).
So Grey is a joke. At best it's a symbolic
issue, and the things it symbolizes to me all
make it seem incredibly dumb that it was
enacted and that people defend it. I mean
dumb, dumb, dumb! You can't write a set of
rules to legislate being Nice without throwing
away the bill of rights.
So what's really going on? I mean, guys like
Grey may not be geniuses, but they're not
(dumb)^3. So what does it symbolize to
them?
--------
[NEXT - GREYASSYM]