[PREV - RANDOM_CONNECTIONS] [TOP]
HONEST_JOHN
April 13, 2003
An interview with Heinlein conducted
by J. Neil Schulman in the 1970s... HEINLEIN
Heinlein goes into the
standard Modern Art diatribe:
"This is a period when a great many
of the so-called fine artists are
apparently painting with old brooms,
and would be horrified at the idea
that picture actually had to *look*
like something? Or say anything to BRIGHT_SILENCE
the viewer? I'm an old square on
that; I want to be able to
understand a picture that I look at."
Schulman mentions his father has color
slides of white, blank paintings, that
his father regards as a "big joke". These are Robert
Rauschenberg's
Heinlein responds: white paintings.
"Yes, I think so, too. Like that (Rauschenberg
pianist here some years back at and Cage knew
one of these far out things who each other,
gave a concert that consisted of and influenced
going to the piano and sitting each other.)
there holding perfectly still for This is
twelve minutes. Never touched the John Cage's
keys. 4'33".
"That's carrying a joke a bit far; 4'33" is often called the
however, if they can get away with "silent piece". Really,
it, it's all right with me, I it's "devoid of
simply won't subscribe to it." intentional sound".
A_BIT_FAR
Now myself, I don't object to
calling this stuff a "joke"
(laughing at it is hardly an If you "get" the concept,
inappropriate reaction). you laugh *with* the artist.
But the suggestion that they're
getting away with something... ?
There's this persistant feeling among
the culturally conservative that Cage
was some sort of con artist, but that's
actually a very odd thing to say: he was
a "con artist" who repeatedly explained
the "con" at great length; a con artist
without deception.
"The Emperor has no clothes!"
"Sshh. Yes, everyone knows that dear.
They're conceptual clothes.
Try to use your imagination."
--------
[NEXT - KNOW_WHAT_I_LIKE]