[PREV - PLAY_BALANCE] [TOP]
INSIDE_AND_OUT
February 21, 2005
In any discussion with "activists"
about how to advance the cause, I apologize for the
arguments about tactics always quotes, but I have
come up that are some form of the trouble using jargon (Wonder
old "inside the system or outside like "activists" Twins!)
the system" debate. with a straight face.
E.g. should we have an obnoxious, "Activist" is a bit better
disruptive demonstration to try than "progressive" though,
and get attention or should we which strikes me as
avoid the risk of alienating the tremendously presumptious.
public and make a show of
reasonable politeness in a bid It's like calling
for sympathy? yourself the "moral
majority".
It always seems to me The opposition
that the real answer doesn't regard
is that you should Thankfully, themselves as
just do it the way brilliant the enemies of
you think is right, ideas like progress.
and let other people slaughtering
do it their way. people
randomly
Having two camps -- with bombs
the radicals and aren't usually
the reasonables -- on the table.
pushing for a
cause is not the Presuming
worst way you can there are no
do things. provacateurs REGES
at the table.
The example that
always comes to
mind is the Civil
Rights movement Though that's
or the 60s. almost as hackneyed
as comparing the
Malcolm X and opposition to the
Martin Luther Nazis.
King were
essentially
playing a big
game of "good
cop/bad cop".
I don't know about Martin Luther King,
but I'm pretty sure that Malcolm X
understood this.
His primary job was to make Martin
Luther King look really good.
--------
[NEXT - LATE_ADOPTER]