[PREV - CIRCULAR_DRUM] [TOP]
INVESTIGATIVE_ETHICS
August 6, 2012
The current NYRB carries a review of
a book by a philosopher at Harvard, Michael J. Sandal,
but I might read it anyway, because "What Money Can't Buy:
it takes an interesting approach The Moral Limits of
toward ethics, exploring various Markets"
cases where markets are used in
unconventional realms, and looking at Reviewed by Jeremy
the way this sometimes strikes us as Waldron, NYRB
evil, and other times not. Aug 16, 2012
That's a cool approach to take in a
lot of ways-- it doesn't preclude
presenting your own opinion, but by
keeping an eye on the perceptions of
actual groups of people, you have a
chance of dodging the usual elitist
finger-waggling at the masses.
Rather than the traditional style of
attempting to derive everything from some
one incontrovertable central principle--
which no one really has-- this gives you a
chance of doing something almost like a
"scientific" form of ethics.
It raises an interesting possibility
of a new take on moral philosophy,
rooted in psychology or anthropology--
you might think of it as inductive
philosophy, trying to infer what our
principles actually are, rather than
trying to derive what they should be.
Possibly: the first stage of formation
of a legal framework... but also
potentially useful just as an ethical
code.
If you want to do as the Romans
you need to know how they roam.
It also has problems: how do
moral philosophies evolve?
Don't they change? If you're
not happy with a conventional
moral response, is there
anything you can say about it?
--------
[NEXT - UNTHINKABLE]