[PREV - CENTRAL_CONTROL] [TOP]
IN_CONTRAST
February 27, 2009
Goethe's theory of color is a prime
example of intellect overreaching.
Goethe himself had no mathematical
background, so he started with the
presumption that math was unnecessary, But before we judge
that Newton was led astry by his Goethe too harshly:
facility (rather than Goethe held back aren't there other
by his lack). cases one can think
of where the winning
Goethe worked up a theory sides were reversed?
of color based on
qualitative reasoning, Perhaps in the realm
starting with the of economics?
importance of contrast
(apparently a notion he Or military planning?
picked up from Aristotle).
Or software engineering?
Or urban design?
Sometimes, in retrospect,
the experts seem rather
lacking in common sense...
(But only sometimes).
Some quotations from Goethe's
"Theory of Colors": MIT Press, NUKE
Translated by
Charles Lock
Eastlake (1840)
13.
In the act which we call seeing, the retina is at
one and the same time in different and even opposite
states. The greatest brightness, short of dazzling,
acts near the greatest darkness. In this state we
at once perceive all the intermediate gradations of
_chiaro-scuro_, and all the varieties of hues
HARMONY OF THE COMPLETE STATE.
708.
The whole ingredients of the chromatic scale, seen
in juxtaposition, produce an harmonious impression
on the eye. The difference between the physical
contrast and harmonious opposition in all its
extent should not be overlooked. The first
resides in the pure restricted original dualism,
considered in its antagonizing elements; the other
results from the fully developed effects of the
complete state.
748.
Colour and sound do not admit of being directly
compared together in any way, but both are referable
to a higher formula, both are derivable, although
each for itself, from this higher law. They are
like two rivers which have their source in one and
the same mountain, but subsequently pursue their way
under totally different conditions in two totally
different regions, so that throughout the whole
course of both no two points can be compared. Both
are general, elementary effects acting according to
the general law of separation and tendency to union,
of undulation and oscillation, yet acting thus in
wholly different provinces, in different modes, on
different elementary mediums, for different senses.
-- Note B B.
752.
Metaphysical formulae have breadth as well as depth,
but on this very account they require a
corresponding import; the danger here is vagueness.
Mathematical expressions may in many cases be very
conveniently and happily employed, but there is
always an inflexibility in them, and we presently
feel their inadequacy; for even in elementary cases
we are very soon conscious of an incommensurable
idea; they are, besides, only intelligible to those
who are especially conversant in the sciences to
which such formulae are appropriated. The terms of
the science of mechanics are more addressed to the
ordinary mind, but they are ordinary in other
senses, and always have something unpolished; they
destroy the inward life to offer from without an
insufficient substitute for it. The formulae of
the corpuscular theories are nearly allied to the
last; through them the mutable becomes rigid,
description and expression uncouth: while, again,
moral terms, which undoubtedly can express nicer
relations, have the effect of mere symbols in the
end, and are in danger of being lost in a play of wit.
--------
[NEXT - ALLUSIVE]