[PREV - ANATHEMA] [TOP]
JARRING
December 17, 2005
April 8, 2007
The fad for "postmodernism"
and "object-oriented programming"
developed around the same time.
My one-sentence review of both:
"There's a lot of jargon here THE_SO_CALLED_HOAX
chasing a small number of ideas."
Once you understand what they're getting
at, it just doesn't seem like that big
a deal. So why the mystification?
The invention of new terminology is supposed
to coincide with a need to handle new concepts.
A group of experts and
a group of con-artists Or: a group of
looks the same at first the conned.
glance.
Really the label
There's a display of abstruse, "con-artists" probably
unfamiliar jargon... often a misrepresents the motives.
pose of superiority, a claim
to inside knowledge. A more interesting social
model is "the conned",
To evaluate the claims or "the self-deluded"...
of this sub-culture,
one must engage on a It's difficult to go
long process of study, through such a process
becoming deeply familiar and retain any sense
with the jargon in-play, of distance from the
developing some facility subject matter...
in the subject matter.
By definition, gaining
It also may take the facility is a matter
prolonged social of immersion in another
exposure and intellectual framework...
involvement with and also in a sub-culture
the peer group. of intellectuals.
The social dynamic:
An intellectual established in some
other field will not have the time
or energy to dedicate to mastering
this New Discipline.
If they express skepticism
about it, they leave themselves
open to attack: how dare they
speak from ignorance?
Ah, the old guard often lacks the
mental flexibility needed to grasp
the new paradigm.
So then, is the new paradigm
then the province of the young?
The proponents of this New Paradigm,
will then begin attempting to
teach it to the young students
under their direction.
But: we are not usually in the
habit of turning the minds of
impressionable undergrads over
to the care of religious fanatics.
The Curriculum has a presumption of
authority, an acceptance by the
community of scholars, perhaps even
some justification for considering
it The Truth.
The standard is supposed to
be a little tighter than
"This is the latest thing!",
or "I'm a believer!".
And any group that succeeds in presenting a
good front, and talking a good line, without
being able to deliver any core of insight...
They're living on borrowed time,
an "exposé" waiting to happen.
Intellectual groups attain status
by convincing people outside the
group of their own inferiority.
If it later seems unjustified,
it's very easy for that sense of
inferiority to turn into a sense
of resentment.
Examples:
Famously: the "post-modern"/
"critical theory" crowd. THE_SO_CALLED_HOAX
Possibly: the "psychoanalysis"
fad, in particular the Freudians.
Nearly every "programming COMPUTER_SCIENCE_PROOF
methodology"
You don't get the virtues of
Object-Oriented Programming?
Ah, yes, the old guard is so
lacking in mental flexibility.
But don't you see
why self-modifying
A suspicion has been growing code is such a
of late that "string theory" powerful technique?
is an example of this syndrome Ah, you have not yet
in the world of physics. truly grapsed functional
programming.
Children of the 80s:
Postmodernism
Object-Oriented Programming
String Theory
Coincidence?
--------
[NEXT - CHROMIATIC]