[PREV - GAGE_THEORIES] [TOP]
LEAVE_OSWALD_ALONE
January 3, 2014
It's interesting the way things like the history of Oswald
acts like chaff in the JFK assassination story... you can
get lost chasing after his weird behavior, trying to make
sense of it-- but what difference does any of it make,
really?
Could he have been a US double-agent pretending to be a
Soviet defector, later betrayed by his US employers?
Could he have been a sincere, pro-Soviet fanatic who
willingly helped assassinate JFK?
In either case, he could have been
set-up as a patsy, or he could've
been the only conspirator who was
actually arrested.
Knowing about details like this
would be interesting, but it doesn't
strike me as crucial...
Elevating the importance of Oswald
seems like coming at it from the wrong end:
It wasn't *just* Oswald.
Maybe it wasn't Oswald at all.
(Feb 26, 2018)
Reviewing the case a little
further, there's one good--
but not great-- piece of
evidence that Oswald was one
of the shooters: supposedly
he ran for it from the book
repository (leaving his rifle
behind...), he was pulled
over by a cop, and he shot
it out with the cop in front
of a witness: a woman standing
on the sidewalk, some hundreds
of feet away.
(And the story goes that he
went to ground in a movie
theater-- a popular suspicion
is that was a meeting place
with his handler-- where he
was arrested... it still
seems pretty remarkably to
me that they caught up to
him so quickly...)
There's some work out there by a
Robert Harris that claims that a
book repository shot doesn't
actually work to explain a
bullet that hit JFK and then
Connolly. He argues somewhat
persuasively that a shooter on
the third floor of the next
building over (the Dal-Tek
building) fits the evidence.
--------
[NEXT - NOTHING_EVER_FITS]