[PREV - LEVI-STRAUSS_VS_SARTRE] [TOP]
LEVI-STRAUSS_OPPOSITION_PARALLEL
December 6, 2021
Kawame Anthony Appiah,
from "The Key to All Myths", LEVI-STRAUSS
on Claude Lévi-Strauss:
"Lévi-Strauss had a gift for finding symmetries,
homologies, and inversions wherever he looked."
"Relations of substitution were dubbed 'paradigmatic';
those of adjacency 'syntagmatic.'"
"This model could be extended into other domains.
Cap, bonnet, helmet, boater, trilby: their
relation to one another is paradigmatic, while
their relation to your head is syntagmatic."
In Lévi-Strauss's 1964 work _The Raw and the Cooked_:
"His analyses here would be the basis of an
equilateral triangle, soon a staple of textbooks ... "
Raw
.
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . . . . .
Cooked Rotten
"Nature is to culture as raw is to cooked.
Animals eat their food raw and are afraid of fire.
Rotting is how nature transforms food: cooking
is how culture transforms food."
"Lévi-Strauss, proceeding with his 'logico-mathematical
analysis,' presented the formula in which 'every myth
(considered as the aggregate of all its variants)
corresponds," namely
F (a):F (b) ~= F (b):F (y)
s y s a-1
The equivalence, he said, signified that any term can be
replaced by its opposite *a* with *a-1*; and that the
'function value' and the 'term value' can be inverted."
Subtracting one from a subscript
to get it's "opposite" strikes me
as very peculiar.
But then the different functions
with subscripts that appear as This really does look
arguments for other functions... like "cargo-cult"
that's kind-of baffling, too. behavior-- aping the
forms of mathematics...
There's no summation symbol in
there, so if there's an "aggregate"
here, I have trouble seeing where.
--------
[NEXT - LEVI-STRAUSS_BARRACKS]