[PREV - CERTAINTY] [TOP]
LINGUISTOLOGY
January 16, 2019
A friend of mine argues that while there DARK_KING
are some influences of language on thought
that have actually been verified (ala Vera
Boroditsky's work), these are actually very
slight compared to the grand dreams of a
Babel-17. BABEL-17
He makes the point that the success of the
movie "Arrival" seems to show people are ARRIVAL
willing to believe in the deep, metaphysical
significance of linguistic structure.
This is certainly true: there may be some
magical thinking underlying the appeal of
the "language is thought" idea-- a belief in
something like incantations or "word magic".
There's a few problems with this case though:
o Is it really true that acceptance
of a fictional premise tells you
something about someone's view of
reality?
There's always a connection between
fiction and reality, but it's never a
simple equivalency.
o Exaggeration is a very common technique in
science fiction: ideas are examined by
claiming the largest possible effects, not
by estimating likely effects.
It's possible to make the opposite
case-- if something appears in a
movie it trivializes it, it's a
sign that it's something no one
really takes very seriously.
Richard E. Geis argued that having
Yaweh turned into a special effect ALTER_EGO
in "Raiders of the Lost Arc" was
a sign that belief in the bible was
on the decline.
Though, fans of Bollywood in India might be
surprised to hear that their affection for
Ramayana films and such was a sign of the
decline of Hinduism.
--------
[NEXT - FORMLESS_EMBRYO]