[PREV - RESIGNATION] [TOP]
LOST_CONTACT
December 2, 2012
Dwight Macdonald, describes what he calls
"The Middlebrow Counter-Revolution":
"Masscult and Midcult",
"In the 'twenties and 'thirties the p. 131
avant-garde intellectuals had it pretty
much their way. In 1940, the DWIGHT_MAC
counter-revolution was launched with
Archibald MacLeish's essay, 'The
Irresponsibles,' and Van Wyck Brooks's
[sic] Hunter College talk, 'On Literature
Today,' followed a year later by his
'Primary literature and Coterie
Literature.' The Brooks-MacLeish thesis
was that the avant-garde had lost contact
with the normal life of humanity and had Ha, what a funny
become frozen in an attitude of destructive idea, eh?
superiority: the moral consequences were
perversity and snobbishness, the cultural
consequences were negativism, eccentricity
and solipsism. [See footnote] The thesis
was launched at the right moment. By 1940
the avant-garde had run out of gas [...]
while the country had become engaged in a
world struggle for survival that made any
radically dissident, skeptical attitude a
luxury.
The footnote referred to above:
"Brooks and MacLeish assumed it
was good for writers to identify
themselves with their society,
which in turn assumed the
society was good. If it wasn't,
then the avant-garde was Well, actually, no. It might
justified in isolating itself." be regarded as their job to
engage with society in order
"Empirically, this would to improve it.
seem to be the case-- at
least most of the Also, it doesn't follow that the
memorable art in every isolated life would necessarily
field produced between be an improvement over the dread
about 1890 and 1930 was imperfections of Society.
done by artists like
Joyce, Elliot, Picasso,
Stravinsky, and others One hates to quibble-- well,
who had rejected all right, maybe I don't hate
bourgeois society." it-- but 1887 was the first I will not argue
publication of Sherlock (for the moment)
Holmes, and by 1890 his about quality, but
popularity immense. the criteria at hand
is whether something
Macdonald refers the reader was "memorable"
to his Partisan Review
article of November-December
1941, "Kultubolsewismus--
the Brooks-MacLeish Thesis",
reprinted in _Memoirs of a Please excuse the cheapshot--
Revolutionist_ (1957). something about reading
Macdonald has me in the mood--
But someone who thinks he qualifies
as a "revolutionist" who spends
all his time sneering at popular
literature is kind of pathetic.
COMMON_RESPECT
But then, maybe the
point is he *used* to
be political before
he sold out to _The
New Yorker_ (which we
will not classify as
"midcult").
DWIGHT_MAC
--------
[NEXT - COMMON_RESPECT]