[PREV - MASTER_META_POP_FALSE] [TOP]
MASTER_CYLLINDER
March 15, 2024
MASTER_PARADIGM
Margaret Masterman, "The Nature of a Paradigm",
_Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge_ (1970)
In the last four pages of her paper on Kuhn's "paradigm"
concept, Margaret Masterman goes off in an interesting
direction, essentially speculating on the possibility that
a computer program might be capable of identifying new
paradigms... or perhaps, determine the range of extent
of existing ones?
"Now there are two forms of formal thinking which are relevant to
the to the analysis of main-feature replication: both of these have
emerged from the computer sciences. The first of these, on which
there is now quite a literature, [p85-2 Parker-Rhodes] is the
mathematics of classification, or of 'clumps'; i.e. the
formalization of the process of finding Wittgensteinian families.
The second of these, on which there is almost no literature, apart
from the general literature on mechanized pattern recognition,
[p85-3 Barus] is the set of procedures for making a digital computer
make an 'inexact match' between two formulae which are highly
similar to one another, but not quite the same."
"In both of these methods, the conglomerates of data in question
have to be characterized by reference to a set of properties with
regard to which an answer can always be given to the question, 'Has
this conglomerated this property or not?'"
"... a strong *prima facie* case could be made for saying that
this 'inexact matching', if and when it can be achieved, is the
'replication- relation' which we are looking for. It is not
certain in which sense it is a relation: it is reflexive and
symmetric, for instance, but not transitive (from the fact that A
has it's main features similar to those of B, and B to those of C,
it by no means follows that A has its main features similar to
those of C, unless each replication has an identical P). Thus
replication-relation logic, in its crude state is a
one-step-at-a-time logic which never gets off the ground; a logic
in which the whole putative effort is to see under what
conditions, and with what weighting, and with what feedback of
information to change the weighting, and at what cost to the
richness and completeness of the characterization scheme, a
limited amount of recursiveness within some particular sequential
pattern of replications, can be established."
"It is not even certain that replication is, strictly speaking, a
form of inference. I do not see, for instance, how any
inference-theorem could be proved of it. In fact, when contrasted
with normal simple deduction, replication, and controlling
replications, is logically horrible. It is however what of all
things, the human brain in its unconscious recognition-processes
seems most easily to do; the artificial intelligence men have now
thrown new light on it [p87-1, Good]; and it is (I think) how
Kuhn's paradigm extends itself. Quite a few very simply
replicating-systems have actually been made; with the field of
information-retrieval, for instance, any retrieval algorithm which
has a scale-of-relevance-procedure attached to it counts as a
replication-system within the description which I have given, as
does any search-procedure which distinguishes main features ..."
By the way, what do you
do when you do quotations
of text with footnotes?
Me, I'm taking a few liberties.
[p85-2 Parker-Rhodes]
MASTERMAN_NOTES_PARKER-RHODES
[p85-3 Barus]
MASTERMAN_NOTES_BARUS
[p87-1, Good]:
MASTERMAN_NOTES_GOOD
--------
[NEXT - MASTERMAN_NOTES_PARKER-RHODES]