[PREV - WORLDGOV] [TOP]
MULTIPLICITY
(as opposed to Unity)
Freeman Dyson argues against WORLDGOV
the One World idea:
All of humanity in a single tightly
integrated system means that a
single error can destroy it.
In Dyson's "Weapons and Hope" he
describes a vision of a "defense
dominated" world.
National boundaries as firebreaks
to protect the whole of humanity
against a system-wide mistake.
Being a creature of my own time,
I tend to focus on diversity over
unification, and I assume it is
difficult for a single government
to allow for it.
I hope for a stable matrix within
which different cultures can
independently exist. (Sterling's "Schismatrix";
Sargent's "Golden Spaces")
The ultimate fragmentation of mankind,
as we learn to modify ourselves, and
each make different choices of
direction.
An opposing view:
Gerald Feinberg's
"The Prometheus Project", ((Feinberg has written a number
from 1968. of other books I should look at.
"Solid Clues". And there's also
He argues that humanity a book about the consequences of
should choose a common growth that I should read... ))
goal for itself.
From the "Outline of History" by
by H.G. Wells: p.1099
"There are unhopeful prophets who see in
the gathering together of men into one
community the possibility of violent race
conflicts, conflicts for 'ascendancy,'
but that is to suppose that civilization
is incapable of adjustments by which men
of different qualities and temperaments
and appearences will live side by side,
following different roles and
contributing diverse gifts. The weaving
of mankind into one community does not
imply the creation of a homogenous
community..."
"The community to which we may be moving will
be more mixed -- which does not necessarily
mean more interbred -- more various and more (Heaven's no, not
interesting than any existing community. more interbred...)
Communities all to one pattern, like boxes of
toy soldiers, are things of the past rather ARYAN
than the future."
--------
[NEXT - SCALE]