[PREV - DIVINE_RIGHT] [TOP]
NATIONS_ABOVE
February 8, 2010
Richard Posner, from
"Public Intellectuals:
A Study in Decline" (p.88) POSNER_DECLINES
"Resort to force is never justified,
in his view, because no nation has
completely clean hands. But it may be
excused when it is by a nation or
group that is neither the United
States nor allied with it. Chomsky is
an anarcho-pacifist. His embrace of
that creed-- which he treats as
self-evidently correct and so doesn't In other words, Chomsky
attempt to defend-- " never actually says this
anywhere.
Which is it? The second sentence
contradicts the rest: Is Chomsky a
pacifist or is he anti-American?
"... illustrates the academic intellectual's
common mistake of confusing political with
personal ethics." Here, Posner's footnote
quotes Max Weber, not
"A private citizen of the United States Chomsky. The Weber
can go through life without killing argues that politicians
anybody or governing anybody; it does not can't turn the other
follow that a large nation can get through cheek, but must fight
its life without governing and without evil with force.
causing people to be killed."
Fair enough, but the
Ye olde divine right of fascists. actual question is
Big daddy is beyond good and evil. how many innocents
You punks on the other hand, better is it okay to kill
stay in line. before your good guy
card is revoked.
DIVINE_RIGHT
Opposing evil with
You might argue it the force sounds good;
other way: the truly Chomsky is more likely
great should be held to to complain about
an even higher standard. supporting evil with
force.
Unless you define evil
as anything that gets
in the way of anything
we might feel like
doing.
(Weber was writing in
1946: he was most
likely thinking about
killing Nazi's.)
--------
[NEXT - COCKBURN]