[PREV - LIVE_TWICE] [TOP]
ODDS_ARE
August 10, 2004
Reading Casino Royale (1953)
by Ian Fleming...
I think it's funny that after all SPOILERS
the verbiage explaining the rules
to Baccarat, after all the scenes
of Baccarat being played, I'm still
a little unclear on the rules.
What happens on a tie?
Is it a do-over? Do the
stakes stay on the table?
Bond's mission in this story is a
believably pathetic cold war errand: In contrast to the films
the head of a lefty French trade where the stakes are
union has been embezzling and needs always nuclear doom and
to make the money back fast by world conquest.
gambling. The Brits would rather
he fall on his face.
What's astounding is the scheme that they
follow: they send in Bond to gamble against
the bad guy, staking Bond with a huge sum
of money.
That's it. They figure Bond can't lose.
There are some extremely
dubious ideas about gambling
being put forth here, without
being explicitly stated.
In trying to show that Bond is a professional,
serious gambler, Fleming has Bond insisting
huffilly that he only bets on odds as close to
even as he can get them.
But that's insane. You can't possibly win over
the long haul unless you can get odds *better*
than even, and needless to say, the house is
not going out of business, which means that the
odds are always less than that.
The presumption (Or nearly always: I've heard that
seems to be that there are card counting strategies
there's some that could get you better than
sort of psychic even odds at Blackjack. The
ability to Casinos responded by increasing
detect when the size of the deck, e.g. by
you're lucky and using quintuple decks it gets much
likely to win. harder to get anywhere by counting.)
I've been confused a few times
by apparently intelligent
people who buy lottery tickets:
"You do understand that the
odds are against you?"
"Why of course I do!
Do you think I'm stupid!"
What I think is that they don't
understand what it means when you
say that "the odds are against you."
--------
[NEXT - WINNING_VESPER]