[PREV - PLEASE_KILL_ME] [TOP]
AUTHENTICALLY_STUPID
December 03, 2005
Okay, so the book "Please Kill Me" PLEASE_KILL_ME
struck me as a great read, and I
really like the way it provides
ammunition against the "punk began
in England" types...
But about half of the way through it
it has dawned on me that it rubs against
the grain on another sore point, there's
another axe I have to grind and this
is a book that tries to blunt that edge,
it is, namely, this:
The original punks
were not stupid.
Punk, despite it's embrace
of crudity, was a movement It was a reaction against
by and for the intelligent. the *really* stupid shit
that was going on at the
When people asked me time: stoner rock, slick
"what do you *like* pop, and disco...
about punk rock", I
responded "the lyrics DISCO_SUCKS
are better".
There were *other* things
I liked about it of course:
the fast beat got the energy
up, the "we're so nasty"
schtick could be funny, the
cheap, populist fashion was
definitely appreciated... But those didn't
seem to be key.
Patti Smith From "Please Kill Me",
Richard Hell quoting Eliot Kidd:
Tom Verlaine "The only thing that made
the music different was that
we were taking lyrics to
For that matter, even Ramones places they had never been
songs had an ironic edge to before." -- p. 260
them missing from any of the
boozin' and ballin' rockin'
that was going on. "Beat on the brat/
Beat on the brat/
Beat on the brat/
With a base-- ball-- bat--/
Oh yeah ..."
So there I am reading
"Please Kill Me", presented
as the Truth of the origins,
told in the form of quotations
from all the players, big and
small. It names all the names
takes things back to their
roots touching on all the
contenders for First Punks: FIRST_PUNKS
The Velvet Underground,
Iggy Pop, The New York Dolls, And the points of contagion
Patti Smith, Television, between New York and
Richard Hell... England are carefully
documented. Unlike *some*
people they don't write
McClauren out of the story.
Then there's this quote from
Legs McNeil himself: PISTOL_WHIPPED
"... because at the that time,
punk was still just the magazine,
the Ramones, Richard Hell,
Johnny Thunders, Patti Smith,
and the Dictators. There was
only about a hundred people
hanging out at CBGBs. And half And it probably didn't
of those people were not punks, take them long to
they were from the art world, understand the concept
inspired to come to the Bowery of being intentionally
by the yuppie whine of David crude.
Byrne." -- p. 232
There was no "punk painting"
to go with "punk rock",
Uh oh. Another defender because that had all been
of the bastion of the done decades before.
True Punk.
We're at a point in history
where CBGBs has begun to
roar, and no one has said
one word about Talking Heads.
There's interviews with The first Talking Heads
every drummer, band manager, record is a *fine*
and groupie you can think example of a punk LP.
of, and they didn't bother I've never liked
to ask David Byrne's opinion "Psychokiller", myself,
about anything? but consider a song
like "No Compassion"...
So, what's going on here? "Talk to your analyst!
That's what they're
What's behind this drive made for..."
to write the Talking Heads
out of history?
There are two possibilities:
(1) The old gang is jealous (Later in the book,
of Talking Heads later Eliot Kidd mentions
success. the forbidden name,
on p.260)
(2) They're pushing the idea
that punk is the triumph of
lower class white trash
stupidity, and the "art school"
crowd doesn't fit into
their thesis.
And this leads into what may
be a rant for another day, but
a few points in outline:
Populism good, elitism bad?
Why?
Stupidity = Authenticity?
NEOPUNK
Are you sure?
--------
[NEXT - DISCO_SUCKS]