[PREV - RANDOM_CONNECTIONS] [TOP]
HONEST_JOHN
April 13, 2003
An interview with Heinlein conducted
by J. Neil Schulman in the 1970s...
Heinlein goes into the
standard Modern Art diatribe:
"This is a period when a great many
of the so-called fine artists are
apparently painting with old brooms,
and would be horrified at the idea
that picture actually had to *look*
like something? Or say anything to BRIGHT_SILENCE
the viewer? I'm an old square on
that; I want to be able to
understand a picture that I look at."
Schulman mentions his father has color These are
slides of white, blank paintings, that Robert
his father regards as a "big joke". Rauschenberg's
white paintings.
(Rauschenberg and
Heinlein responds: Cage knew each other,
and influenced each other.)
"Yes, I think so, too. Like that
pianist here some years back at This is
one of these far out things who John Cage's 4'33" is often
gave a concert that consisted of 4'33". called the
going to the piano and sitting "silent piece".
there holding perfectly still for Really, it's
twelve minutes. Never touched the "devoid of
keys." intentional
sound".
"That's carrying a joke a bit far;
however, if they can get away with
it, it's all right with me, I A_BIT_FAR
simply won't subscribe to it."
Now myself, I don't object to
calling this stuff a "joke"
(laughing at it is hardly an If you "get" the concept,
inappropriate reaction). you laugh *with* the artist.
But the suggestion that they're
getting away with something... ?
There's this persistant feeling among the
culturally conservative that Cage was some
sort of con artist, but that's actually a
very odd thing to say: he was a "con
artist" who repeatedly explained the "con"
at great length; a con artist without
deception.
"The Emperor has no clothes!"
"Sshh. Yes, everyone knows that dear.
They're conceptual clothes.
Try and use your imagination."
--------
[NEXT - KNOW_WHAT_I_LIKE]