[PREV - LIVE_TWICE] [TOP]
ODDS_ARE
August 10, 2004
Reading Casino Royale (1953)
by Ian Fleming...
I think it's funny that after all SPOILERS
the verbiage explaining the rules
to Baccarat, after all the scenes
of Baccarat being played, I'm still
a little unclear on the rules.
What happens on a tie?
Is it a do-over? Do the
stakes stay on the table?
Bond's mission in this story is a
believably pathetic cold war errand: In contrast to the films
the head of a lefty French trade where the stakes are
union has been embezzling and needs always nuclear doom and
to make the money back fast by world conquest.
gambling. The Brits would rather
he fall on his face.
What's astounding is the scheme that they
follow: they send in Bond to gamble against
him, staking him with a huge sum of money.
That's it. They figure Bond can't lose.
There are some extremely
dubious ideas about gambling
being put forth here, without
being explicitly stated.
In trying to show that
Bond is a professional,
serious gambler,
Fleming has Bond
insisting huffilly that
he only bets on odds as
close to even as he can
get them.
But that's insane. You can't
possibly win over the long
haul unless you can get odds
*better* than even, and
needless to say, the house is
not going out of business,
which means that the odds are
always less than that. (Or nearly always: I've heard that
there are card counting strategies
that could get you better than
even odds at Blackjack. The
The presumption Casinos responded by increasing
seems to be that the size of the deck, e.g. by
there's some using quintuple decks it gets much
sort of psychic harder to get anywhere by counting.)
ability to
detect when
you're lucky and
likely to win.
I've been confused a few times
by apparently intelligent
people who buy lottery tickets:
"You do understand that the
odds are against you?"
"Why of course I do!
Do you think I'm stupid!"
What I think is that they don't
understand what it means when
you say that "the odds are
against you."
--------
[NEXT - WINNING_VESPER]