[PREV - NEVER_SAY_NEVERYON]    [TOP]

WAR_AND_PEACE


                                            November 20, 2000
                                       Rev: February 11, 2005

About "War and Peace" by Tolstoy.

I read this nearly ten years ago,            Published
in the early 90s, but that was               1865-1869
evidently in a period where I  
wasn't writing much in the doomfiles,
because there's no trace of it here.

Gathering some bits and pieces 
of things posted elsewhere:

                                              (November 20, 2000)
   
Tolstoy managed to                      
write a novel that         Or at least, he                        
attacks the idea of        argues for a view                      
heroism and yet it         of history that                        
clearly has a hero.        undercuts                              
                           the possibility of     
                           heroism.               
Prince Andrew is a                           
sympathetic, competent              
character who is                                        
nevertheless caught up       (If I'm gonna spell        
in the same madness as       Tolstoy with a "y",       
everyone else in the         I might as well go      
novel.                       all the way with        
                             "Prince Andrew")                    
   Or: subject               
   to the same                               
   implacable           
   historical            
   forces as 
   the rest of      
   humanity.    
                                             
                  And the novel still
                  works as a novel.  
       
       
       
Some good bits:
       
                                            July 31 2000
Pierre gets interested in some
liberal ideas, but is unable to do
much about them.  But Prince
Andrew is influenced by Pierre to        
actually take some steps toward          (Andrew is the novel's
freeing the serfs under his control      Competent Man...)    


                                            July 31 2000
The upper classes had so much      
sympathy for France!  Many of them    
speak French much better than they    
do Russian.  For them, the war with    
Napoleon was very much a war with    
the country they regarded as the    
seat of culture: this was          
practically a civil war.           
                                       (August 17 2005)              
     Strange that they went                                    
     along with it without                 (January 28, 2006)  
     complaint.  Perhaps: they      
     wanted to *play the            Upon re-reading, I see              
     game*... they wanted to        that Tolstoy shows different 
     fight as well as the           factions at work among 
     French because they            the upper class, where 
     wanted to be the French.       one salon -- the most useless, 
                                    the most shallow, in this 
                                    account -- would have liked 
               Also notably,        to sue for peace and  
               one faction          become subjects of Napoleon.
               of the                                     
               peasants             The Real Russians, however 
               has no               experience an eruption of 
               problem              patriotism, and are determined 
               with                 to fight to the death. 
               changing                                   
               masters...


                                             May      17, 2002
                                        Rev: February 11, 2005

The "inside story" of the Freemasons,
the initiation ritual.

Pierre wanting to do something
idealistic with the Freemasons, but
instead he finds it used as a
vehicle for social networking.
People have joined his chapter just
so they can hob-nob with rich
people such as himself.


                                          May 17 2002
It was pretty funny to read Tolstoy
ranting at length about how grossly
over-rated Napoleon's "genius" was.   
                                      
                                     This goes along well 
                                     with H.G. Wells' take  
                                     in his "Outline"...

An odd point: 

Ultimately, Tolstoy's
point is that the will of                 He argues that the
the great are irrelevant                  correlation between great
compared to the will of                   men and great events
the people.                               doesn't imply causality,
                                          and asserts that it goes
    But all of his                        the other way: The will of
    characters are                        the people creates and then
    members of the                        destroys the great.
    upper class.

    We see very little                        DIFFERENTIAL_OF_HISTORY
    of "the people".



    I'm very interested in Tolstoy's
    notion of potency though a
    respect for your own impotency,         KUTUZOV
    e.g. in the case of Kutúzov.
              
    But it's not clear if it means
    anything to Tolstoy but faith
    in providence.                      SURFING_HISTORY
              
              
          Pierre's epiphanies about
          freedom == misery, and how
          happiness is achieved
          through poverty and              AGAINST_FREEDOM
          imprisonment are not
          without interest...
              
          But there might be an
          objection or two raised
          to that, eh?  Some
          people might find it a
          bit suspicious even: a 
          member of the upper   
          class preaching the  
          virtues of servitude.
              
            In general, there seems to
            be a pattern of unconvincing
            religious material in                ANNA_KARENINA
            Tolstoy's fiction.
                                                           (Compare and
                  A corner that he                          contrast:
                  backs himself into?                       Nicholas and
                                                            Levin?)  
                  If intelligence is useless,
                  reading a snare and a delusion,
                  history a lie, genius a myth,
                  freedom a guarantee of suffering,
                  and all human ambition and striving
                  empty vanity...

                      That's a pretty grim world to
                      face without faith in providence
                      to fall back on.


Some random quotations follow.
And some not random ones.


  HISTORYS_SLAVE             
  WARRING_PIECES             
  CARBONUNDRUM                 
  AGAINST_FREEDOM          
  DERANGEMENT                  
  MOTIVATION                    
  TOYING_WITH_TRUTH      
  TOYING_WITH_TECH        
  TERRIBLE_KNOWLEDGE    
  KUTUZOV                                   
  DIFFERENTIAL_OF_HISTORY   
  TREED                                       
  BIG_SKY                                   
                                                              
                                                              
                                                                   
       These are from several different                       
       sources, indicated by the codes:                       
                                                              
       "WC" = Wordsworth Classics edition.                    
                                                              
       "GP" = Gutenberg Press edition.               The translator isn't 
                                                     specified for either 
       "RE" = Penguin paperback edition,             the WC or the GP (?!)
              Rosemary Edmonds, trans. (1957)                 
                                                        The WC claims their
                                                        translation was    
                                                        Tolstoy approved.  
                                                                  
                                                            There are some    
                                                            differences       
                                          Russian has       between            
                                          a reputation      translations      
                                          as a logical      but they seem   
                                          language,         very slight.  
                                          and Tolstoy                       
                                          gives the         "command"       
                                          impression        vs. "order"     
                                          of a man            
                                          trying to          MOTIVATION 
                                          be clear,         
                                          rather than    I would guess 
                                          stylish or     that there's 
                                          poetic.        little controversy 
                                                         about how to 
                                                         translate 
                                                         "War and Peace".

--------
[NEXT - HISTORYS_SLAVE]