[PREV - FILE_SYSTEMS_REISING] [TOP]
REISERS_GUILT
February 19, 2017
Hans Reiser, after doing a superb job of creating
file-systems (and an impressive job of annoying FILE_SYSTEMS_REISING
linux kernel developers), murdered his ex-wife.
We now know that this is definitely the case, but
there was a long period where this was just a
suspicion, and there was an ongoing debate
about whether it was well-founded.
It was the open source world's OJ Simpson
trial, with people determined to take sides,
often for reasons that seemed unrelated to
the evidence of the case.
Myself, I was annoyed at the treatment Hans
Reiser was getting-- there was a lot of
presumption of guilt that in my opinion was just I remember resenting
based on the general feeling that Reiser was a feeling the need to
weird guy. The treatment the case recieved from get into this... none
police and prosecution was eye-opening in a of us were on the jury,
number of respects. Very few people were willing but the man was on
to speak up in defense of Reiser, or even in trial in a "court of
defense of his right to fair treatment-- Rick public opinion", and
Moen is one of the few who come to mind. I was developing fears
that the jury was not
as isolated from public
After it was definitely confirmed that he had opinion as we've been
killed her and tried to cover it up, a friend led to believe...
of mine addressed a gathering asking "So, did
you think he was guilty?" LETS_PLAY_JURY
I didn't say anything, and didn't know what I
should say... thankfully I don't think I ever
expressed an opinion either way, the kinds of
things I had been saying was "I have no idea if
he's guilty, but I'm convinced that if he's
convicted it's going to be for being too weird
for the jury, not because he's guilty of murder."
But my memory was that there were various points where I
learned (or thought I learned) some detail that made
me go "Oh no... maybe he really did do it."
But I was also leery of the quality of the information we
were getting, and the channels through which it was being
transmitted... e.g. someone commenting on a newspaper story
would mention in passing that neighbors had seen him hosing
down the drive-way in the middle of the night. That gave
me a sinking feeling... in confluence with some other odd
things Reiser had done, it sounded pretty bad. But then,
why hadn't I heard it from anywhere else? Where did the
guy saying it hear it from?
Looking over the things that I said
online during that period is a mildly
painful experience, and I think I can
see why I get bogged down in this
subject when I try to write about it.
There are a few places where I get very
close to saying I think he was innocent But then, I no longer
(e.g. I declared the prosecution's have a clear memory of
evidence seemed "thin" or "weak")-- what I knew about the
prosecution's evidence
when I said that.
The morass: What did we know, and
when did we know it?
Have I edited some embarassing
remarks out of my memory?
But what had I heard about the
evidence at that stage? OUTLINE_OF_EVIDENCE
Could it be that some of the
things I think I know now aren't
really quite true?
Do I want to take the effort to
research this again, at this
late date?
--------
[NEXT - LINUX_REISING]