[PREV - ERASED_MARS] [TOP]
RICE_AND_SALT
July 10, 2010
In the grip of a weeks-long fever (an
antibiotic resistant strain of bronchitis),
I read Kim Stanley Robinson's novel,
"The Years of Rice and Salt" (2002).
As I began to read it, I had a fear that he was
going to write over my head. This is a fiction
of alternate history, and he was assuming a fair
knowledge of history to begin with. Would I even
notice the point at which the fictional history
diverges from the real?
I actually did read past it, in my fever-addled state,
but he made it clear enough. To the question "what
happened to the Khazars?" he answers, reasonably
enough, that maybe they all died off in a plague. He
then observes that they were located upstream (albeit
some distance) of Constantinople: in this version of
history, Constantinople is wiped out along with the
Khazars, so this is essentially a version of history
without Christians.
Question: what does Robinson think would be different
about a world without Christians? Answer: nothing
much. The industrial revolution begins in a
different place (Samarkand), feminism develops a
little later, in the Islamic world, and so on.
There's an analog of World War I not much different
from our own (trench warfare, gas, bombs).
In the first few sentences of the book-- which
is also a reincarnation-based fantasy, by the
way-- Robinson informs us that he's writing
about Monkey, the Chinese folk hero from a MONKEY
16th century novel. Nothing is actually done
with this notion, and the character bears no
resemblence to Monkey.
I think Robinson was just jamming, doing
a little of this and that, and seeing
where it all ended up.
The answer, in my opinion,
is "nowhere": this is book Many people appear to disagree
entirely without a point. with this, however, and we
might make some allowances
considering my aforementioned
fever-addled state.
--------
[NEXT - WRONG_TO_THE_CORE]