[PREV - EST] [TOP]
SCIENCE_AND_SANITY
March 08, 2021
So, I was babbling about Korzybski again
the other day, and it occurred to me I
haven't really *read* that much of his
stuff, so I picked up my hardback copy (A bookmark receipt informs me I
of "Science and Sanity" spent over $26 on this at Adobe
Books, back in the days when it
was still on 16th Street).
I decided to skip past the front matter, which is a solid
quarter inch of this book's one-and-a-half inch total, once
you add up all the introductions to the Nth edition,
prefaces, "prelimenaries", and so on. I began reading at
the true beginning: Chapter One of the 1933 edition.
This book is one of the funniest things I've read in a long
time, it's so transparently ridiculous it makes the long
list of people impressed by it seem really crazy: Heinlein,
Englebart and William S. Burroughs were all reportedly fans
of this work.
In case you haven't heard, this is a book of new
discoveries of new ways of thinking which will
transform humanity.
There's an analogy to the revolutions
in physics (relativity/quantum
mechanics) that isn't actually stated
as an analogy. A close reading shows
that Korzybski is claiming that these
are merely special cases of his new
style of thinking.
He leads off with what he presents as an
observation that the key aspect of humanity--
in fact, he claims this is the essence of Actually, he doesn't
humanity, this is his *definition* of explain what he means
humanity-- is that it engages in "time-binding" by "time-binding" at
(which is to say delayed gratification). this point, I've heard
it explained already by
He then immediately states that most human some of his acolytes
beings aren't doing this, they're behaving because I'm an SF nerd.
in a mode more like animals. So what
happened to this as the *definition* of THE_SECRET_MASTERS_OF_DESTINY
humanity? If it isn't what most humans do,
how can that work?
Korzybski then states-- or strongly implies-- that
working through this "time-binding" insight has led
to his grand discovery of "non-aristotelian" logic,
which leaves him in awe of the tremendous scope of
his own work (he forgives the reader for any shock
they might feel).
He then wanders around a bit and says, with a
straight face, that one must be careful about
over-generaliztion.
And I put the book aside for the nonce,
giggling like a madman (admittedly one of my
specialties).
--------
[NEXT - ID_DENTED]