[PREV - EROTICA_GAMES] [TOP]
SOMETHING_VISUAL
December 14, 2002
I'm not a big fan of much of the video
porn I've seen, but then I haven't made
any serious attempt at getting into the
subject, e.g. it never occurs to me to
read reviews of porn videos, so renting (One of the
one is always a total gamble done on problems is that
impulse. Good Vibrations
closes too early.)
The still photo is probably a
better medium because it's a
simpler art form and there are
fewer things they can get wrong.
Also, there's a point that McCluhan
made a long time ago about "cooler" "I sometimes wonder if men's
mediums being more engaging because taste for visual porn
there's more room for the play of indicates a lesser capacity
your imagination. for visual imagination, not
the reverse, as is so often
EROTICA_GAMES supposed." -- Zoe of alt.gothic
WITHIN_OR_WITHOUT
This is cute, but why
not apply it to other
artforms?
"Why do you keep reading poetry?
Don't you know what words
are like by now?"
The lack of technical skill
in most porn videos is often
complained about.
I often wonder:
is this a feature? Does it (inadvertantly?)
leave more room for
Does it make them play of imagination?
seem nasty/transgressive?
Raw, nasty,
dirty, gritty: Conversely, I've heard
ugly. the complaint that if
it's marketed as "erotica"
Alternately: it's going to be boring.
I've heard it argued
that porn is faddish It avoids being
and hence must be "disturbing" and
made very quickly: hence avoids hitting
the transgression
There's certainly button.
some truth in that.
But on the other hand
at least some can
made with a more
"classic" appeal.
"The Art of Bondage"
series is unlikely
to seem dated soon:
NORMAL_PERVERSION
--------
[NEXT - ANIMAL]