[PREV - ON_THE_ISLAND] [TOP]
SUCKING_VORTEX
January 14, 2007
February 15, 2007
I made a stray remark -- once again --
about the sucking vortex of Long Island...
My sister, the Sun Fish, argues SUN_FISH
against my usual New Urbanism
"cities good"/"suburbs bad" line
with the example of one of our The Sun Fish put a lot of
Long Island dwelling sisters. emphasis on how this was
"the life she choose", which
She also brings up the example I think misses the point:
of the romantic poets, who she
says would frequently retreat Our choices are
to the wilderness, and yet constrained by a
maintained a community with landscape warped by
each other. many strange
policy decisions.
She tries to I would make the point
use these that the Romantics would
counter not have had that
examples to community, were it not
disprove my for the civilization of And something similar
general rule. cities that they were could be said for our
retreating (vacationing?) sister, who I agree
Her claim is from... is doing okay...
that there for someone stuck
is "nothing And similarly the on Long Island.
inherent" in Beats would not have
the suburbs met without cities,
or cities that though the group
makes one included wilderness
better than freaks like Synder.
the other.
I'm pretty sure that she
doesn't quite get it... Suburbs can really be festering
pits of stupidity and misery,
But just for the hell even if there are a few
of it, consider the exceptions of people thriving.
possibility that my
"general rule" is
sloppier than I think.
Are there enough exceptions
to amount to something?
Possibly: a study of the
exceptions, looking for Is there a way for
additional principles... civilization to thrive,
in spite of countervailing
forces?
--------
[NEXT - BLACKOUT_2003]