[PREV - THE_PROFESSIONAL_GOODMAN] [TOP]
THE_ENCRYPTION_HAMMER
April 26, 2009
August 27, 2013
At the last CodeCon-- the one held at
cellspace in 2009, someone gave a talk
insisting that internet voting systems
have a future, but it requires educating
the technophobes to accept it.
A few points:
(a) the flaws in conventional low-tech voting
systems are real, but how hard are they to
fix by conventional means? Isn't it just
a matter of will?
(b) if you can't trust The Establishment to
gather boxes of full of paper ballots, why
would you trust them to install a secure
electronic voting system?
Isn't it much more likely that they'll do
a bait-and-switch, promising to install
something that you'll approve of, and then Even having a way
changing it around at the last minute (at to detect that
which point you'll be reclassified as an there's been a
out-of-touch egghead with no grasp of switch is tricky.
practicalities).
You might say, well okay, we'll need to
exercise extreme vigilence during the
period of installation of a new system--
but isn't it easier to maintain vigilence
with the much simpiler paper ballot BURNED_IN_2004
systems?
There are techies out there-- still!--
who let technicalities blind them What stops someone
to the obvious. from just selling
their private key?
TECHIES_FALLACY
My impression is
This kind of syndrome makes it that this guy is
difficult to bitch about people living somewhere
who refuse to listen to the between Bruce
experts. Schneier's first
and second book.
--------
[NEXT - SEARCH_FOR_A_SEARCH]