[PREV - TWO_THE_IGNORABLES] [TOP]
TWO_LEAKS
September 17, 2021
From material originally published
at the dailykos in 2015.
TWO_GATES
The Need for Leaks
So, how to proceed? I suggest:
(1) embrace the fact that you really are using rules-of-thumb that
automatically downgrades the opinions of some factions (there's
no need to feel ashamed or lazy about this: it's a necessity).
(2) create some exceptions for your perception filters: engage with
the "ignorables" with an open-mind on occasion, to see if you can
learn something from them. This might even be formalized-- "Every
third Sunday, I will park my snark-reflex, and try to talk
reasonably with Those Guys."
Stage one is a very quick-and-dirty process: you have to expect it to
be fallible... so ideally it should leak: it should be possible to
make it through even if the usual criteria isn't met. If it doesn't
ever leak, we should look into opening up some holes to make it leak.
The phenomena that some people refer to as living in an "echo chamber"
or a "bubble" is a disease of the first stage: if you use affinity to
rigorously screen for voices to listen to, and never engage seriously
with any dissenting voices, there's a risk of getting trapped in
groupthink.
(Though conversely: if you do no screening at all, you can waste your
life arguing with people who aren't worth your time, who haven't taken
the trouble to master the basics, or perhaps aren't capable of it.)
One of my ideas is to decree a
"blue moon day" that I set aside to
engage with people who I normally Another idea would be
might ignore. Actual blue moons are to have some designated
a little too infrequent for this trusted diplomats
purpose so it should probably be (speaker-to-ignorables)
something else... maybe "first that look around for
prime Saturdays" would work. material that should be
brought to the attention
of the home bubble.
None of us are really in
this alone: I need to get
out of the habit of
thinking as though I'm
running a solo operation
with one member
--------
[NEXT - CREDENTIALS]