[PREV - MODEL_X] [TOP]
URB
November 10, 2001
what is a city?
A definition solely in terms of
population density is shallow,
because no one really cares about
that directly.
Better would be to think
about what people like (and dislike?)
about cities, and then talk
about why those properties
have traditionally
gone along with the high
densities.
Jane Jacobs focuses on
the way in which it
allows multiple Specifically: the
different kinds of use of shared spaces
people to interact. in different ways MONOCULTURE
at different times.
If the point then is not
how tightly packed people
are, but how many
different kinds of people
you're in contact with, "How big is your town?"
then you could have a is really
relatively small town "How many people can you reach easily"
that functions in a very or more likely
city-like way, provided "How many different kinds of people".
the population was
diverse enough.
Conversely, you could have a huge
mono-cultural mass that would be And note: as the highways were
little better than a small town. built, and the US car culture
ramped up, the same territory
could go from isolated to
connected and back to relative
isolation again: connected by
Changes in new highways, then choked off
communications by rising traffic.
technology can
be relatively
connecting or
isolating:
Connecting connections:
"party"-line telephone.
shortwave/citizen's band radio.
usenet newsgroups. email mailing lists.
Isolating connections:
caller-to-caller telephone.
"mass media" broadcast.
livejournal
And maximized connectivity itself
is not an unalloyed good: CONTROL
A certain amount of serendipity
in who you talk to while on the
street or waiting on line at the
local cafe, that's all to the
good.
A constant parade of babbling
strangers through your office
would not be so good.
--------
[NEXT - FLORENCE]