[PREV - SENTIMENTAL_TAIL]    [TOP]

UNCONSTRAINED


Thomas Sowell in his book "A Conflict Of Visions" talks 
about two views of humanity.                 
                                             
Unconstrained:                      Constrained: 
Human capability is                 Human capability is 
fundamentally unlimited.            fundamentally limited. 
No problems are beyond              Some problems we just  
the reach of a dedicated,           have to learn to live 
benevolent intellect.               with, because no one is smart  
All the parameters of humanity      enough to think of everything,  
can ultimately be modified to       and attempts at solutions lead  
achieve an end to suffering.        to unexpected consequences.    
                                    You can't change human nature. 
                                             
Loosely, these coincide with:                
                                             
      LIBERALS               and          CONSERVATIVES.   
                                             
But only loosely.  Personally, I think it's really 
interesting that conservatives are strictly  
speaking conservative on economic and social 
issues whereas liberals are quite conservative on 
environmental issues.                        
                                             
The world ecology is a very        The national economy is a very 
complex structure.  As yet         complex structure.  As yet 
we do not fully understand it      we do not fully understand it 
(perhaps we never will).           (perhaps we never will).
Since we can not fully predict     Since we can not fully predict 
the results of the changes we      the results of the changes we 
make, we should try to avoid       make, we should try to avoid 
making changes, particularly       making changes, particularly 
major ones, considering how        major ones, considering how 
many lives are at stake.           many lives are at stake. 
                                             
                                             
 Jean-Jacques Rousseau             John Locke
 "Du Contrat Social"                "An Essay concerning Human Understanding"  
                     
 "Man was born free,               "All men are liable to error;
 and everywhere he                 and most men are, in many
 is in chains."                    points, by passion or   
                                   interest, under temptation
 ("L'homme est ne' libre,          to it."                  
 et partout il est dans                              (1690)
 les fers".)                                        
              (1712-1778)                                            

                                                                     
                                                                     
 A friend of mine pointed out to me that                             
 Sowell's schtick bears much resemblance        Sometime I'll try to 
 to this old Locke-Rousseau business...         look up Rousseau and    
                                                Locke in Sowell's    
      (I felt pretty                            index.  Maybe I just    
      stupid I hadn't                           missed it?            
      noticed this.) 
                                                          
                                                         
Reading through Wells "Outline" I realize                
something else I should've noticed long                  
ago:                                                     
                                                         
I've tended to think of Socrates as being                
a rational christ, a martyr to reason as                 
opposed to faith.                         ONERELIGION    
                                                         
But from another point of view,                          
Socrates genuinely was a man capable                     
of "corrupting" youth.  If you preach                    
skepticism, if you demand to know the                    
reason for everything, than you run                      
the risk of breaking some very sensible                  
rules just because you aren't yet able                   
to understand the reasons for them.                      
                                                         
--------
[NEXT - CONSERVATIVE]