[PREV - NOSOCKS] [TOP]
AGAINST_PEPI_FORMS
August 12, 2025
Starting over again, reading a little
more carefully (not that it helps much):
_Against Platforms_ (2025) AGAINST_PLATFORMS
by Mike Pepi
subtitle:
"Surviving Digital Utopia"
"Critics have been clear to point out that the problems with
Silicon Valley's expanded view, revealing the ways in which the
hidden cost of the platforms were off-loaded onto social
institutions. As Facebook whistle-blower Frances Haugen put it,
they 'sold us democracy, but we got dictatorship.' But this
strategy of tech critique has run it course. Meta, Amazon, Uber,
and their ilk have accelerated the more nefarious natures of
postindustrial capitalism, damaging our institutions, our minds,
our economy, and the planet. Yet the critique is too narrow.
It's not enough to say that five or six massive technology
platforms must be dismantled, weakened, or demonized. And it's
not enough to say that technology alone-- the actual tools and
their functions-- are the enemy." p.32
You may be wondering what is enough, and
Pepi's answer-- at this stage of the book--
is that we need to challenge the underlying
philosophy and attitudes of much of the tech
world's "evangelism".
Pepi complains about
techno-determinism
techno-fixation
techno-utopianim
techno-music
(Oh, wait, he
forgot that one.) Oddly, he objects even to
techno-critique, though at
least he conceeds that some
techno-techno might be okay.
"How do these successive waves of
utopian hype continue to happen despite
their limited real-world traction?
First it was virtual reality, then
social media platforms, the sharing One might object that
economy, the metaverse, blockchain, and virtual reality wasn't
as of this writing. AI-- the hype cycle really the first fad,
is unceasing. They are agnostic to the and Pepi has skipped
technology itself, as evidenced by the a number of them that
alacrity with which boosters change out probably happened
their momentary obessions-- one quarter before he was born.
it's Web 3.0, the next it's AI." p. 33
Whenever I talk about
the weirdly faddish
But yeah, preach it. nature of the tech
world, programmers who
I'm somewhat baffled that people aren't too much younger
don't seem to notice this cycle... than me tend to say
but maybe that impression is just "Remember XML?"
the studied ignorance of the
business press and the other
industry shills.
"When you point out the flaws of digital
utopianism you will be givine a common
retort: 'So what's your plan?'" p. 35
Well, yeah, from me too. When you're
stating the obvious point that things
suck, we might be forgiven about being
curious about recommended courses of
action-- or even just a discussion of
possible courses of action.
"Utopian political thinking is so moribund
precisely because it disallows critique to
gain traction. Is sees the world in
black-and-white-- progress and blockers." p. 35
A problem with True Believers, to be sure:
You're either with us or against us; Part
of the solution, or part of the problem.
Nevertheless, I remain interested in solutions,
and the possibility of some sort of progress.
"We need not demand perfection in demanding
institutional reforms. Digital utoptians Everything sucks and
focus on the current rot as a reason to nothing sucks worse than
rebuild from scratch and aim for perfection. people who think they can
The weakness of utopians is that they don't make it not suck.
want to do the hard work of figuring out the
problems right in front of them."
And since the author is not one of
these utopian extermist types, we Really, if I'm reading
can look forward to some hard work him right, he concludes
and problems figured. with something like
"capitalism sucks, so
we need the government
to run everyting."
We need to nationalize
the means of social
mediation. Or something.
This chapter concludes:
"At the moment in which an ideology threatens
to settle into normalization, the most
powerful resistance is a criticism that
brings its contradictions into the light. And so okay, maybe
The only technology that can unseat the pace some techno-critique
of digital utopianism is language itself." is okay-- a few pages
p. 36 ago I thought it was
"not enough". I guess
One would imagine that someone the idea is those
writing a book thinks words can *other* critiques are
do something useful. not enough, but this one
is the real deal.
Myself, I'm still holding out
hopes for improvements in our
literary technology.
--------
[NEXT - PLATFIX]