[PREV - FULL_DISCLOSURE] [TOP]
APPLIED_LIGHT
November 23, 2009
October 25, 2013
Another exercise.
A starting point:
To distingusish between
paid propangists and
real human beings, you THE_TOY_WEB
need to know who you're
talking to.
METHOD_OF_LIGHT
refract, reflect, focus, filter
refract
A spectrum of humanity,
not just a single class:
a hired public relations
agent may actually know
something worth hearing,
an amateur may still be Identity is necessary,
a propagandist, though not but not sufficient:
a volunteer. one must have a way
of evaluating quality.
reflect And might not
that be focus
One might want to know identities and filter?
in order to find the professionals
rather than to exclude them. (I'm switching
subjects in the
(Citizendium) middle...)
Back to the starting point:
You might ask if the premise
is correct: are there other Is asking that
ways you might identify a question a reversal
hired gun, soley through (a reflection),
analysis of style or content? or perhaps some sort
of refraction?
The answer is yes, a
perceptive reader can
do this, but it's
usually impossible to
convince someone else To really "focus" we'd
you've done it have to get down to
correctly, so it the technical means,
doesn't work to develop what do you consider
a body of shared adequate means of
knowledge. establishing identity?
--------
[NEXT - LIGHT_EXERCISE]