[PREV - ON_THE_SCHOLES_OF_PARADOXY] [TOP]
ARTS_AND_KRAFT
April 11, 2014
Robert Scholes, in "Paradoxy
of Modernism" touches on some ON_THE_SCHOLES_OF_PARADOXY
of the oft referenced works by
Walter Benjamin:
He complains about Greenberg's "insistence
that kitsch is 'mechanical and operates by
formulas.'", and comments:
"We can clarify this problem by rethinking
Walter Benjamin's distinction--"
"The actual oral storyteller, whether epic
or more humble, worked with formulas at every
level--"
"Formulas belong to crafts; mechanical
reproduction belongs to industry. They are
very different things, and the tendency of
the Modernist critics to equate them is a
major [source of their confusion]." In the original quote,
Scholes' employs his
own invented jargon:
"-- is a major aspect of
Modernist paradoxy."
Later Scholes talks
about art vs. craft:
" ... the level of craft, as
opposed to art, perhaps, or the
level of entertainment--"
Can we speak about "craft"
in opposition to "art"?
I think craft refers to *how* and
*who* produced an art-- it's only
loosely connected to the effect
of the art.
Crafts can produce an art in a popular mode
(e.g. "kitsch" or "entertainment") or it can
produce a more elite form with a appeal to a
smaller niche.
Note that industrially manufactured or
electronically transmitted art might actually
be the work of a few lone creators.
I think there's a confusion here born of the long
era where mass media such as movies and television
were *expensive*, and hence the product of armies
of creators working in elaborate management
hierarchies.
The actual trouble with "mechanical
reproduction" (really, with mass media) SIN_OF_FORM
is that it makes many creators embarrassed
about re-trying an idea until they get it
right.
The doctrines of novelty, of pure creative
genius, are the enemy of evolution...
--------
[NEXT - SIN_OF_FORM]