[PREV - INCREDIBLE_BUSH] [TOP]
A_CHOICE_OF_DENIAL
February 20, 2007
July 15, 2007
So, what do you *want* to believe?
Andrew Cockburn brings up a plausible DUBIOUS_FLARE
pyschological theory about the truthies:
"One characteristic of the nuts is
that they have a devout, albeit
preposterous belief in American
efficiency, thus many of them start
with the racist premise that
'Arabs in caves' weren't capable
of the mission. They believe that
military systems work the way
Pentagon press flacks and aerospace
salesmen say they should work."
[ref]
They don't *want* to believe that
a small group of fanatics can get
in such a powerful hit.
It's comforting, in a way, to believe
that it would take the resources of
a United States in order to damage The world is a more
a United States. fragile place than
they're willing to
And in the case of the Kennedy believe.
assassination, the idea that
all it takes is one lone nut TIPS_FOR_T
to take-down the president...
that can be a pretty disturbing
idea.
Similarly, you can argue that
the opposition to a conspiracy
theory is indulging their own And there's another form of denial:
dreams and fears... the notion there are many people who want to
that the US government is so believe that the Bush administration
warped that it's attacking the would not embroil us in a war with
US-- there are reasons one might another country without a very good
be in denial of that also. reason: hence the common, well
established delusion that Iraq had
something to do with the 9/11
attack.
MOST_TRUSTED_NAME
There's a a choice of states
of denial in which to exist. (United States of Denial?
I bet that one's been used
So... what differences before...)
in psychology leads one
to one or the other
sort of denial? (Alexander Cockburn, by the way,
is into Global Warming denial...)
What's yours?
--------
[NEXT - MOST_TRUSTED_NAME]