[PREV - NUCLEAR_DENIAL] [TOP]
A_POLITICAL_SCIENCE
June 25, 2013
GETTING_WARM
In KSR's 40/50/60 series, the
main character pushes hard to
make the NSF a more politically It's almost his only
engaged entity-- real positive effort
throughout many hundreds
There are meetings where a of pages.
number of people at the NSF
discuss this.
No one raises what should be a stunningly
obvious point: political engagement is the
opposite of objectivity and neutrality.
Even if you don't believe that something
like objectivity can actually be achieved
by any real human institution, even if you
don't believe that it's at least a worthy
goal; that appearence of disengagement is
one of the things that science has going
for it as far as influencing human opinion
at large goes.
The suspicion that science has
been corrupted by environmental This is an all-too-plausible
activism is one of the things that scenario, I would say.
the global warming denialists have
had on their side. THE_HERETIC
Surrendering all appearence of Though this possibility
objectivity could actually reduce doesn't seem to me to matter
the political effectiveness of the that much:
scientific establishment.
"Oh my god, what if the global
warming scenario is wrong and
we dismantle the coal industry
for nothing?"
Even in that case it
wouldn't be for nothing,
it would be saving ~20k
US lives annually.
Cleaner technology
would be a good thing
to have in any case.
COAL_DEATHS
--------
[NEXT - WARM_ENEMIES]