[PREV - PEACOCKS_IN_FIGHT] [TOP]
BELL_TOLLING
August 31, 2012
December 5, 2013
Julian Bell, in his review of Dutton,
is largely interested in a gotcha PEACOCKS_IN_FIGHT
concerning the rate of evolution,
and the timing of our aquisition of
language.
Roughly, he wants to argue that since
storytelling relies on the language
capability, if you want storytelling
to be critical to our evolution, the Bell may be falling into a trap
time period for that to happen has to that I fear people with humanist
be compressed too much, into the period backgrounds are prone to: in
after we've acquired language. introductions to evolution, much
emphasis is placed on how *slow*
Bell states his case: it is-- a gradual accumulation of
tiny changes over a long period
"But from them he draws a striking of time. While that's true
statistic on which to erect his in outline, there's no reason to
arguments about art's evolution. be dogmatic about this "speed
Almost all we know of the arts comes limit". Genetic changes can
from the five hundred-odd generations accumulate quickly under unusual
between the beginnings of civilization circumstances (such as an
and the present-- surely too little artificial breeding program), and
time for large-scale adaptations in natural circumstances may apply
behavior to occur. But human beings more or less pressure for change
have in fact been evolving through a at different times.
good 80,000 generations, since the
dawn of the Pleistocene era 1.6
million years ago."
"That span is ample to permit many an
adaptive feature to imprint itself on
the brain-- notably a disposition
toward certain sorts of landscape,
Dutton starts by suggesting, and a
disposition toward creating
fictions. Fiction entails holding in
suspense the actuality and the use
value of objects, so that we start to
appreciate their potential beauty."
"... one might beg for some
clarifications. 'Fiction,' a central
component of Dutton's hypothesis-- the
underpinning, seemingly, of our sense
of beauty-- he repeatedly equates with
'storytelling,' something that would
seem to require grammatical language;
but grammatical language, the majority
of human evolutionists agree, is
unlikely to have predated the
emergence of Homo sapiens sapiens, our Graphic art first,
own subspecies, some 160,000 years Then language,
ago, which would reduce Dutton's Then linguistic art.
available time for all the adaptations Why not?
needed to sustain the arts to a mere
8,000 generations, rather than
80,000. But then his sketch of an
explanatory 'theory' is shot through
with strategic vaguenesses. [4] "
--------
[NEXT - BLEAK_DINER]