[PREV - JONAHS_COOKIE] [TOP]
BICAMERAL_CITY
January 29, 2012
Here's a story:
Since the inception of the modern era,
since the scientific revolution and the We could tell other
industrial revolution, we've all lived stories about a multi-towered
in a city of two towers. place that might more
accurately reflect our
The newer tower now over-shadows own world:
the old-- some even argue there's not
much need for the old. science
technology
But there are some of us who've walked religion
away from this bicameral city-- we art, traditional
envision a place of high, arching sky art, modern
bridges connecting our twin towers; art, popular
and someday they may be so interlaced
that they've effectively become one
structure.
There are these two modes of understanding,
two methods of approaching the world and
we feel in our guts that there must be
some way of blending these two into one.
And even if we're wrong in this monotheistic
impulse, even if there's no Grand Unified Method
that's workable, there ought to be some way of
at least defining the boundary between the two
methods.
One is quick and deep, whereas
the other is slow but sure. Understanding
fast and slow?
We might: FIRE_MIND
Look to the arts
for understanding
where science fails.
Look to the arts
to see where science
has not yet gone.
Look to the arts
to see where science
should go.
--------
[NEXT - LOST_SCIENCE_OF_ART]