[PREV - DEEPKEYS] [TOP]
CENTIPEDE
August 14, 2006
Richard Kostelanetz is
a guy whose name I've
come across in a
surprising varieties
of contexts...
For example, he's a frequent
contributor to the libertarian He's suceeded in placing
magazine "Liberty", and also the same article with both
the author/editor of a number "Liberty" and "Social
of books about John Cage -- Anarchism".
including the excellent
"Conversations with Cage". I should found an
award celebrating
There is no inherent that sort of
reason that an interest achievement, but
in free market economics I'm not sure what
and avant garde art to call it.
should not go together
but in practice this is
astoundingly rare.
HONEST_JOHN
It's one of my own conceits
that I cover a lot of ground
myself: I'm a multilegged
creature with a foot in a
number of different camps
and I don't often encounter
monsters of my own ilk.
Kostelanetz appears to be The New York Times
of the same genus, if not Magazine once ran a
quite the same species... photo of his home
so I accord him some respect. titled something like
"Clutter as a Strategy".
Great minds...
I should add that
Kostelnanetz is also
a good example of
the rare breed of
the independant LAST_INTELLECTUALS
intellectual, and
a professional one
at that. (Amateur class thinkin' fellers
like myself are getting pretty
common in the internet era.)
But in spite of this -- or perhaps
because of it? -- I get the sense that
Kostelanetz don't get no respect.
For example, I encountered
some folks -- professional
academics, as I remember -- (This was on
who were sneering at one of "silence", a
the Kostelenetz books about mailing list
Cage. The charge: too about Cage.)
"self-promotional".
I discussed this on the list some
years later -- after I had read
some of the book itself, and found
it belonged in the Doesn't Suck
category -- and got some strange (I also discovered that
email in return, including some Kostelanetz himself had
long missives from a fellow who been lurking on the list,
didn't want to speak up in public, and received a note of
but complained bitterly about the thanks from him...)
Kostelanetz "M.O." in reviewing
books. The charge: Kostelnetz is
harsh on any book that doesn't
reference Kostelnetz.
And I've come across examples
that might support that point.
The Kostelanetz review of "The
Last Intellectuals", for The thing about this
example, complains that the is that I'm not sure
problem Kostelanetz talks about that I care.
in "The End of Intelligent
Writing" is not addressed. Okay, so he hasn't
mastered the art of
false modesty.
To me, it just seems
like a funny quirk.
Smile, roll your
eyes, whatever.
Complaining about
this seems like
addressing style
over substance.
--------
[NEXT - END_OF_INTELLIGENT_WRITING]